Teams

Ace Assassins

2026 PAVO LOCO · 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings7 teams · 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Volley of the Damned - Coy/Ross3184992
2Acin' Voorhees31841093
3Ace Assassins317513100
4KillerDolls316615123
5The Unforced Terrors135716111
6Smashmosas135717121
7Death by a thousand lets043919130

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Sarah Knight
published
3.44
Kirsten van Haaren
published
3.41
Lydia Stout
published
3.40
Jacob Senters
published
3.38
Kristen Tewell
published
3.32
Chris Ensslin
published 3.5
3.29
Margaret Bush
published
Asher Smith
published 3.5
Caeden Bartley
published 3.5
3.24
Mily Ralsten
published
3.17
Doris Senters
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Knight + Doris Senters6162% games+5.8% vs expected
Doris Senters + Kirsten van Haaren9258% games+5.5% vs expected
Kristen Tewell + Doris Senters6351% games−0.2% vs expected
Mily Ralsten + Doris Senters224 matchesnot enough data
Mily Ralsten + Kirsten van Haaren303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Knight
23W–6L career · no lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.50
Kirsten van Haaren
30W–17L career · no lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.44
Lydia Stout
14W–4L career · no lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.41
Jacob Senters
8W–9L career · no lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
Kristen Tewell
20W–7L career · no lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Chris Ensslin
10W–2L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Margaret Bush
12W–14L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Asher Smith
1W–6L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Caeden Bartley
2W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Mily Ralsten
14W–17L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.24
Doris Senters
60W–44L career · no lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.17

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.