Teams

Sunpro-Jensen

2025 USTA Mixed 40 & Over · mixed 6.0 40 & over

14 players · average NTRP 2.94 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-04vs Utah/Haroldsen/Mixed40&Over6.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesCarrie Jensen / Scott T Jensen vs Nancy Matz / Michael Keough3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCarolyn Woods / Jeffrey Woods vs Brian Smith / Nicole Leatham1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMelissa Reoch / Dennis Larson II vs Staci Dansie / John Dansie6-1, 6-1
2025-03-28vs Liberty Park-CruzSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMarilyn Patch / Jeff Stokes vs Bernadette Muniz / Soheyl Tadjiki5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesVal Christensen / Rachelle Lee vs Jennifer Murphy / David Hadley6-2, 6-1
2025-03-21vs Salt Lake Tennis-CracroftLost 03
L#1 DoublesAndrea Cook / Jr Cook vs Melissa Holyoak / Mark Follette3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMelissa Reoch / Dennis Larson II vs Scott Aucutt / Mandy Aucutt6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesVal Christensen / Rachelle Lee vs Joann Kuncewitch / Tom King6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2025-03-14vs Utah/Haroldsen/Mixed40&Over6.0Split 11
W#1 DoublesCurt Kulakowski / Rebecca Waite vs Casey Buxton / Kelly Singer6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCarolyn Woods / Jeffrey Woods vs Nancy Matz / Michael Keough1-6, 2-6
2025-03-07vs Liberty Park-CruzWon 21
L#1 DoublesCarrie Jensen / Scott T Jensen vs Soheyl Tadjiki / Wendy Conrad3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJeff Stokes / Karen Murray vs Kyoko Jensen / Arnel Cruz1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAndrea Cook / Jr Cook vs Jeff Beckstead / Cicily Beckstead6-2, 6-3
2025-02-28vs Salt Lake Tennis-CracroftSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMarilyn Patch / Jeff Stokes vs Mark Follette / Shannon Sturtevant2-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJr Cook / Andrea Cook vs Scott Aucutt / Mandy Aucutt7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2025-02-21vs Utah/Haroldsen/Mixed40&Over6.0Split 11
L#2 DoublesKaren Murray / Curt Kulakowski vs Pat Williams / Andreas Baumgartner3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesJeff Stokes / Marilyn Patch vs Nancy Matz / Michael Keough6-4, 6-4
2025-02-07vs Liberty Park-CruzLost 12
W#1 DoublesJeff Stokes / Melissa Reoch vs Dave Carlen / Megan Brown4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCarrie Jensen / Scott T Jensen vs Bernadette Muniz / Mark Sabouri1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCurt Kulakowski / Rebecca Waite vs Kyoko Jensen / Arnel Cruz1-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for mixed 6.0 40 & over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.83
Carrie Jensen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.82
Rachelle Lee
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Curt Kulakowski
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Dennis Larson II
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.75
Melissa Reoch
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.73
Andrea Cook
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.71
Marilyn Patch
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.56
Karen Murray
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.52
Rebecca Waite
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.20
Carolyn Woods
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Jeff Stokes
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Jr Cook
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Scott T Jensen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Val Christensen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Curt Kulakowski + Rebecca Waite162843% games−9.6% vs expected
Carrie Jensen + Scott T Jensen73935% games−10.5% vs expected
Melissa Reoch + Dennis Larson II3546% games−12.1% vs expected
Marilyn Patch + Jeff Stokes101249% gamesnot enough data
Andrea Cook + Jr Cook4551% gamesnot enough data
Jeff Stokes + Karen Murray4251% gamesnot enough data
Rachelle Lee + Val Christensen2445% gamesnot enough data
Carrie Jensen + Curt Kulakowski123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Carrie Jensen
138W–169L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Rachelle Lee
52W–48L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Curt Kulakowski
18W–43L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Dennis Larson II
6W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Melissa Reoch
90W–77L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.75
3
Andrea Cook
51W–40L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%2%
2.73
3
Marilyn Patch
100W–140L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Karen Murray
56W–61L career · 2 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
2.56
Rebecca Waite
41W–80L career · 2 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
2.52
2.5
Carolyn Woods
27W–79L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.20
Jeff Stokes
36W–27L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jr Cook
4W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Scott T Jensen
7W–49L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Val Christensen
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.