Teams

BP RED

2022 CTA ADULT 18-39 - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN

8 players · average NTRP 4.12 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-08-01vs NJ BLUELost 01
L#1 Female SinglesAnitra Sopronyi vs K Autumn Hartley6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2022-07-18vs BRMST REDWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesCameron Passmore / Alecxis Naviaux vs Hillary Riley / Courtney Chan6-4, 6-4
2022-06-27vs BRMST REDWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesMegan Fischbach / Anitra Sopronyi vs Katherine Lazenby / Hillary Riley6-3, 6-2
2022-06-13vs NJ BLUELost 12
L#1 Female DoublesMegan Fischbach / Kara Jewett vs Erica Moser / Natalia Isabel Camera Perez4-6, 3-6
W#1 Female SinglesAnitra Sopronyi vs K Autumn Hartley2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 Female SinglesAlecxis Naviaux vs Alexis Keller3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2022-06-06vs BRMST REDWon 20
W#1 Female SinglesAnitra Sopronyi vs Olivia Belton6-4, 6-1
W#2 Female SinglesCameron Passmore vs Aly Miller6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · WOMEN 4.0 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PRKR GREEN5110821152
2BP RED3310818155
3HRCA BLUE2481024169
4NJ BLUE1551329194

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.88 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Cameron Passmore
usually #2 Female Singles 50%, also #1 Female Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.10
Jordan Pullman
published
3.97
Anitra Sopronyi
usually #1 Female Singles 75%, also #1 Female Doubles 25% · published 4
3.76
Alecxis Naviaux
usually #2 Female Singles 50%, also #1 Female Doubles 50% · published 4
3.71
Kara Jewett
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Kelsey Pobanz
published
Lindsay Montoya
published
Megan Fischbach
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cameron Passmore
83W–32L career · type A · 2 lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
4.13
Jordan Pullman
27W–14L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
4.10
4
Anitra Sopronyi
38W–29L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%59%41%
3.97
4
Alecxis Naviaux
69W–37L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Kara Jewett
57W–42L career · 1 line in 2022
6%93%1%
3.71
Kelsey Pobanz
17W–18L career · no lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.59
Lindsay Montoya
8W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Megan Fischbach
22W–18L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.