Teams

Armonk Tennis: Gimme A Break

2022 65&Over Women · 7.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-08-17vs TCH: Crazy AcesLost 12
W#1 DoublesMegan Dempsey / Nancy Simon vs Jeanne Lucido / Barbara Penge1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJune Ottinger / Madelyn Jordon vs Rita Raz / Linda Borenstein1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMary Bracken / Flo Wiener vs Sara Goldsmith / Shirley Shwiel2-6, 3-6
2022-08-16vs Match Point: You've Been ServedWon 21
W#1 DoublesMegan Dempsey / Marianne Melielo vs Judith Ames / Elizabeth Saetre6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesNancy Simon / J Susan Hessney vs Margaret Drescher / Karen Martini6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesPatricia Pingitore / Cheryl Kaufmann vs Phyllis David / Shirley Liu0-6, 6-7
2022-08-11vs TCH: Crazy AcesWon 30
W#1 DoublesMegan Dempsey / Marianne Melielo vs Barbara Penge / Sara Goldsmith6-2, 4-5
W#2 DoublesJ Susan Hessney / Nancy Simon vs Linda Borenstein / Jeanne Lucido6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDiana Cunningham / June Ottinger vs Mary Denham / Shirley Shwiel6-3, 6-1
2022-08-01vs NYAC- Ace BandagesWon 20
W#1 DoublesMegan Dempsey / Nancy Simon vs Susan Belardino / Debra Urbinati7-5, 7-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Kasarsky / J Susan Hessney vs Joan Caulway / Diane Lock6-4, 7-6
W#1 DoublesMegan Dempsey / Marianne Melielo vs Mary Keough / Marianne Surre6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJ Susan Hessney / Mary Bracken vs Jessica Woolf / Diane Bernstein6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesCheryl Kaufmann / Susan Kasarsky vs Maureen Heaslip / Bernice Tracey6-2, 6-3
W#1 DoublesMegan Dempsey / Marianne Melielo vs Grace Bender / Nancy Cuppek6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNancy Simon / Patricia Pingitore vs Ellen Cooper / Kathy Goltzman0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMadelyn Jordon / Susan Kasarsky vs Joan Behren / Myrna Gardner0-6, 3-6
2022-06-30vs Match Point: You've Been ServedLost 12
W#1 DoublesMarianne Melielo / Megan Dempsey vs Elizabeth Saetre / Katie Neuman6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMary Bracken / June Ottinger vs Jane Groveman / Nancy Fila6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNancy Simon / Diana Cunningham vs Judith Ames / Shirley Liu1-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesMegan Dempsey / Nancy Simon vs Diane Bernstein / Marianne Surre3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMary Bracken / Diana Cunningham vs Mary Lofaso / Nancy Benson3-6, 7-6
W#3 DoublesCheryl Kaufmann / June Ottinger vs Bernice Tracey / Thuy Tran-Quinn6-4, 4-5
2022-06-13vs NYAC- Ace BandagesLost 12
L#1 DoublesDiana Cunningham / Patricia Pingitore vs Victoria Lopinto / Lynn Corritori0-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMary Bracken / June Ottinger vs Alice Ryan / Debra Urbinati3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMadelyn Jordon / Susan Kasarsky vs Diane Lock / Maura Denigris6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesMarianne Melielo / Patricia Pingitore vs Grace Bender / Nancy Cuppek3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMegan Dempsey / Nancy Simon vs Amy Tuller / Joanne Clark2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJune Ottinger / J Susan Hessney vs Joan Stone / Deborah Barnwell6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

J Susan Hessney
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.10
Marianne Melielo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Diana Cunningham
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.60
Mary Bracken
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Cheryl Kaufmann
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
June Ottinger
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Megan Dempsey
usually #1 Doubles 89%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published
Nancy Simon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
Patricia Pingitore
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Susan Kasarsky
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Simon + Megan Dempsey11450% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Simon + J Susan Hessney3546% gamesnot enough data
Megan Dempsey + Marianne Melielo5071% gamesnot enough data
J Susan Hessney + Susan Kasarsky224 matchesnot enough data
Mary Bracken + June Ottinger224 matchesnot enough data
Megan Dempsey + Mary Bracken123 matchesnot enough data
Diana Cunningham + June Ottinger123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
J Susan Hessney
34W–34L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Marianne Melielo
18W–22L career · 6 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.10
3
Diana Cunningham
39W–42L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%50%50%
3.00
Mary Bracken
27W–30L career · 5 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
2.60
Cheryl Kaufmann
5W–11L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
June Ottinger
23W–36L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Megan Dempsey
27W–32L career · 9 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nancy Simon
25W–41L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
Patricia Pingitore
9W–16L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Susan Kasarsky
13W–13L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.