Teams

PCRK RED

2022 TRIO - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - TRIO

6 players · average NTRP 3.25 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-04-16vs HFII BLUELost 03
L#1 DoublesChristine Maggio / Carol Brohl vs Jeana Marks / Ann Hugh2-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesJuli Reiakvam vs Melissa Owens3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMolly Holewinski / Janice Kercheville vs Gretchen Garrison / Melissa Wern7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2022-04-09vs WC REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesCarol Brohl / Janice Kercheville vs Andrea Milanovich / Melanie Adams2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJuli Reiakvam vs Shawna Saussus6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMolly Holewinski / Christine Maggio vs Kristina Stack / Jessica Seidlitz2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-04-02vs LEBTC BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesJanice Kercheville / Juli Reiakvam vs Tari Gold / Pamela Probst6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJaime West vs Karen Ramon6-0, 7-6
W#2 DoublesCarol Brohl / Christine Maggio vs Susie Taylor / Janet Swanson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-03-26vs HRCA PURPLELost 02
L#1 DoublesMolly Holewinski / Juli Reiakvam vs Claudia Swanson / Gretchen Burr6-1, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJaime West vs Ann Patel3-6, 4-6
2022-03-19vs LTFC REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesCarol Brohl / Christine Maggio vs Celine Ormond / Christine Paulsson4-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesJaime West vs Erin Wade6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJanice Kercheville / Juli Reiakvam vs Lynn Pearson / Jacalyn Peter3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - TRIO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Carol Brohl
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.26
Jaime West
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Juli Reiakvam
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
2.86
Janice Kercheville
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Christine Maggio
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Molly Holewinski
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jaime West + Carol Brohl7358% games−2.6% vs expected
Christine Maggio + Carol Brohl2341% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carol Brohl
106W–68L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Jaime West
49W–36L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
3
Juli Reiakvam
48W–81L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%13%87%
3.15
3
Janice Kercheville
63W–31L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
2.86
Christine Maggio
10W–6L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Molly Holewinski
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.