Teams

BIR DURANT

2022 FW USTA · USPTA Adult Fall Ladies N

23 players · average NTRP 3.55 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for USPTA Adult Fall Ladies N have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Bree Young
published 4
3.88
Laura Heibel
published
3.75
3.75
3.63
Lori Sciremammano
published
3.60
Kathleen Czaicki
published
3.51
Shawna Maginniss
published
3.42
Barbarita Nieri
published 3.5
3.38
Gina Godsey
published 3.5
3.37
Camille Reid
published 3.5
3.33
Melissa Laymance
published
3.27
Kimberly Blakey
published
3.27
Kimberly Blakey
published
3.27
Melanie Bartlett
published
3.27
Melanie Bartlett
published
JULIE ANDREWS
published 3.5
3.21
Chelsea Klinke
published 3.5
3.16
Paige Whitmire
published
3.15
Andrea Riddle
published 3.5
3.12
Susan Covington
published
3.08
Gillian Ashton
published 3.5
Anne Gannon
published 3
2.62
Lisa Premo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gina Godsey + Kimberly Blakey123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bree Young
26W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
3.96
Laura Heibel
27W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.88
Luz Cristina Rodriguez
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Carrie Hoogendoorn
34W–21L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.75
Lori Sciremammano
10W–22L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.63
Kathleen Czaicki
12W–1L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
Shawna Maginniss
15W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%48%52%
3.51
3.5
Barbarita Nieri
31W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Gina Godsey
23W–18L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Camille Reid
18W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.37
Melissa Laymance
17W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
Kimberly Blakey
36W–27L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Kimberly Blakey
36W–27L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Melanie Bartlett
27W–16L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Melanie Bartlett
27W–16L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
JULIE ANDREWS
3W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Chelsea Klinke
12W–12L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
Paige Whitmire
8W–9L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Andrea Riddle
9W–11L career · type S · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
Susan Covington
7W–18L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.12
3.5
Gillian Ashton
5W–3L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
3
Anne Gannon
0W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lisa Premo
6W–8L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
2.62

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.