Teams

MP:Meserve:Meserve

2024 ME Fall Tri Level · Women's 4.0

5 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MAINE

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-12-08vs FF:SommerLost 01
L#1 DoublesKerry McCormick / Amy Chiu vs Deanna Mao / Barbara Marr3-6, 1-6
2024-12-08vs APEX:KapothanasisLost 01
L#1 DoublesHiroko Meserve / Kerry McCormick vs Anastasia Kapothanasis / Valentina Kapothanasis7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2024-11-16vs APEX:Joanna:PondLost 01
L#1 DoublesHiroko Meserve / Jennifer Blanchette vs Lorraine Fagela / Anne Vaillancourt3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-11-16vs Apex:KonieczkoLost 01
L#1 DoublesHiroko Meserve / Amy Chiu vs Ellen Konieczko / Sharon Wedge1-6, 2-6
2024-11-03vs Apex:MarroquinWon 10
W#1 DoublesHiroko Meserve / Jennifer Blanchette vs Anna Fiorentino / Chelsie Woods6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-11-03vs APEX:Joanna:PondLost 01
L#1 DoublesHiroko Meserve / Jennifer Blanchette vs Joanna Pond / Susie Coughlin6-7, 2-6
2024-10-19vs APEX:KapothanasisLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmy Chiu / Hiroko Meserve vs Anastasia Kapothanasis / Valentina Kapothanasis1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-10-06vs Apex:KonieczkoLost 01
L#1 DoublesLynne Chicoine / Amy Chiu vs Polly Colvin MacKenzie / Sharon Wedge5-7, 4-6
2024-10-06vs Apex:MarroquinLost 01
L#1 DoublesKerry McCormick / Lynne Chicoine vs Chelsie Woods / Claudia Marroquin7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2024-09-21vs FF:SommerLost 01
L#1 DoublesHiroko Meserve / Amy Chiu vs Kristie Green / Deanna Mao6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Amy Chiu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.80
Kerry McCormick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.53
Hiroko Meserve
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.32
Jennifer Blanchette
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lynne Chicoine
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hiroko Meserve + Jennifer Blanchette3547% games+7.4% vs expected
Amy Chiu + Lynne Chicoine14956% games+3.5% vs expected
Amy Chiu + Hiroko Meserve033 matchesnot enough data
Hiroko Meserve + Kerry McCormick033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amy Chiu
43W–33L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%90%10%
3.83
Kerry McCormick
118W–57L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.80
4
Hiroko Meserve
73W–104L career · 7 lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.53
Jennifer Blanchette
43W–61L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.32
Lynne Chicoine
39W–20L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.