Teams

Nunu Mixed Summer

OBX MIXED 18 & OVER · 3.5 MIXED

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-08-12vs 2026FloydMixedWon 20
W#2 DoublesNurefsan Journigan / Brian Rubino vs Mandy Earnest / Daniel Smith6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKevin McKeever / Inna Pencheva vs Thommy Floyd / Judie Fien-Helfman6-0, 6-2
2026-07-30vs 2026FloydMixedWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrian Rubino / Brooke Samson vs Emma Turnbull / Daniel Smith6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKevin McKeever / Veronica Kent vs Stephanie Wills / Kevin Zygler6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBo Rhodes / Rhonda McKeever vs Brie Floyd / Thommy Floyd6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2026-07-29vs 2026FloydMixedWon 21
W#1 DoublesBrian Rubino / Brooke Samson vs Porsche Polise-Zygler / Kevin Zygler6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesInna Pencheva / John Leatherwood vs Brie Floyd / Tom Acree3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesVeronica Kent / Kevin McKeever vs Emma Turnbull / Thommy Floyd6-4, 6-2
2026-07-16vs 2026FloydMixedWon 30
W#1 DoublesInna Pencheva / Kevin McKeever vs Stephanie Wills / Tom Acree1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBo Rhodes / Veronica Kent vs Emma Turnbull / Thommy Floyd6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJohn Leatherwood / Karyl Rhodes vs Brie Floyd / Daniel Smith6-4, 7-6
2026-07-03vs 2026FloydMixedWon 21
W#1 DoublesNurefsan Journigan / Bo Rhodes vs Thommy Floyd / Ksusha Johnson5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBrian Rubino / Karyl Rhodes vs Stephanie Wills / Kevin Zygler1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJohn Leatherwood / Inna Pencheva vs Porsche Polise-Zygler / Daniel Smith7-6, 6-3
2026-06-25vs 2026FloydMixedWon 21
W#1 DoublesBo Rhodes / Inna Pencheva vs Stephanie Wills / Daniel Smith6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesVeronica Kent / Brian Rubino vs Brie Floyd / Tom Acree6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJohn Leatherwood / Rhonda McKeever vs Porsche Polise-Zygler / Kevin Zygler3-6, 5-7
2026-06-23vs 2026FloydMixedWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrooke Samson / Kevin McKeever vs Ksusha Johnson / Tom Acree6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNurefsan Journigan / Brian Rubino vs Daniel Smith / Emma Turnbull6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBo Rhodes / Inna Pencheva vs Thommy Floyd / Mandy Earnest6-0, 6-0
2026-06-18vs 2026FloydMixedWon 21
W#1 DoublesBrooke Samson / Kevin McKeever vs Ksusha Johnson / Daniel Smith6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesNurefsan Journigan / Brian Rubino vs Kevin Zygler / Porsche Polise-Zygler6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJohn Leatherwood / Rhonda McKeever vs Thommy Floyd / Judie Fien-Helfman6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2026-06-04vs 2026FloydMixedLost 12
L#1 DoublesBrian Rubino / Veronica Kent vs Ksusha Johnson / Tom Acree4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKevin McKeever / Karyl Rhodes vs Emma Turnbull / Daniel Smith5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBo Rhodes / Rhonda McKeever vs Brie Floyd / Thommy Floyd6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5 MIXED
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Nunu Mixed Summer8120720190
22026FloydMixed1872043289

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Brooke Samson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.59
Brian Rubino
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.34
Kevin McKeever
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.31
Bo Rhodes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
John Leatherwood
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.23
Inna Pencheva
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.22
Nurefsan Journigan
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.20
Karyl Rhodes
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.89
Rhonda McKeever
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Veronica Kent
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rhonda McKeever + Kevin McKeever3550% gamesnot enough data
Karyl Rhodes + Bo Rhodes224 matchesnot enough data
Rhonda McKeever + John Leatherwood033 matchesnot enough data
Kevin McKeever + Inna Pencheva213 matchesnot enough data
Brian Rubino + Nurefsan Journigan303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brooke Samson
56W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%6%94%
3.72
3.5
Brian Rubino
34W–22L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%26%74%
3.59
Kevin McKeever
47W–57L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Bo Rhodes
31W–23L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
John Leatherwood
13W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Inna Pencheva
51W–26L career · 6 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Nurefsan Journigan
22W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Karyl Rhodes
18W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.20
Rhonda McKeever
59W–47L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.89
Veronica Kent
40W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
2.86

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.