Teams

Yates 18s 3.5

2022 Piedmont USTA 18 & Over · WOMEN 3.5 18 & Over

13 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Rachel Kohler
published
3.31
Margaret Joseph
published
3.24
Allison Walsh
published 3.5
3.21
Stephanie Gilmer
published
3.20
Lucy Callahan
published
3.18
Britt Molitoris
published 3.5
3.11
Dana Cossick
published 3.5
3.09
Jen Strasser
published
3.04
Jennifer Yates
published
2.87
Rebecca Morrison
published
Kim Kyle
published
Melinda Billings
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Yates + Allison Walsh1441% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rachel Kohler
34W–15L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Chetana Honnarayanahalli
30W–30L career · type A · no lines in 2022
71%29%<1%
3.43
Margaret Joseph
17W–8L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Allison Walsh
20W–27L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
Stephanie Gilmer
11W–25L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
Lucy Callahan
12W–22L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Britt Molitoris
8W–17L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Dana Cossick
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.11
Jen Strasser
6W–6L career · no lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.09
Jennifer Yates
8W–28L career · no lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.04
Rebecca Morrison
14W–21L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
2.87
Kim Kyle
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Melinda Billings
5W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.