Teams

LMadonna (Weddington)

2022 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 2.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-03vs RJampani (Blakeney)Won 10
W#2 DoublesLaurie Madonna / Heather Burch vs Melanie Cox / Alia Nassri3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSue Selleck / Maryann Whalen vs Leslee Black / Mary Eshleman3-6, 4-6
2022-04-19vs MMcSherry (PCC)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLaurie Madonna / Maryann Whalen vs Laurie Eatman / Brenley Ogden4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-04-10vs SKopf (Raintree)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMaryann Whalen / Heather Burch vs Crissa Klein / Emily Ladky3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesLaurie Madonna vs Sara Kopf2-6, 2-6
2022-03-29Lost 01
L#2 DoublesHeather Burch / Laurie Madonna vs Jazzmin Romero / Sabina Skolnick6-7, 1-6
2022-03-22vs CMcKiernan/VShannon (Raintree)Won 10
W#1 DoublesMaryann Whalen / Sue Selleck vs Mary Anne Bullock / Ciara McKiernan3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-03-21vs ALedoux/DFricke (Firethorne)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLaurie Madonna / Kristina Campbell vs Kate Wodyka / Caroline Lattanzi1-6, 1-6
2022-03-01vs TAmos/AEagan (Weddington)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSue Selleck / Maryann Whalen vs Tracy Amos / Amanda Eagan1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.50 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.69
Kristina Campbell
published
2.58
Laurie Madonna
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.57
Lori Holman
published
2.49
Heather Burch
published 2.5
2.15
Maryann Whalen
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Nara Gregg
published
Sue Selleck
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laurie Madonna + Kristina Campbell5165% games+15.7% vs expected
Heather Burch + Laurie Madonna2351% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristina Campbell
32W–13L career · no lines in 2022
0%8%92%
2.69
2.5
Laurie Madonna
90W–89L career · 5 lines in 2022
0%27%73%
2.58
Lori Holman
12W–10L career · no lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
2.57
2.5
Heather Burch
16W–13L career · no lines in 2022
0%52%48%
2.49
3
Maryann Whalen
25W–113L career · 5 lines in 2022
>99%<1%<1%
2.15
Nara Gregg
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sue Selleck
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.