Teams

Wynbrooke (Karen Davis)*

USTA Atlanta Summer - 18 & Over Business Women - Regular · 3.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 2.80 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2026-06-14vs Southland CC (Karmen Williams)*Lost 13
L#1 DoublesGloria Byrd / Karen Davis vs Danielle Corneille / Annette Johnson1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesDebbie Stewart vs Ashley Jordan0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBrandy Pryor / Chaundra Wright vs Deidra Cloud / Ekiyah Shelby6-3, 6-3
L#4 DoublesFlorastine Webster / Dee Carty vs Jeralyn Smith / Jacquelyn Watlington1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.62 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Jimyesha Laurent
published
2.91
Brandy Pryor
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.84
Chaundra Wright
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Debbie Stewart
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.61
Tina Harris
published
2.55
Jacqueline Lockett
published
2.54
Gloria Byrd
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.54
Andrea Hart-Vann
published 2.5
2.30
Florastine Webster
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.23
Terri Webb
published
2.15
Dee Carty
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Leilani Stamper
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chaundra Wright + Brandy Pryor9066% games+12.2% vs expected
Gloria Byrd + Brandy Pryor5550% games−1.4% vs expected
Florastine Webster + Tina Harris044 matchesnot enough data
Florastine Webster + Terri Webb044 matchesnot enough data
Florastine Webster + Dee Carty033 matchesnot enough data
Dee Carty + Terri Webb033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jimyesha Laurent
18W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.43
3
Brandy Pryor
16W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Chaundra Wright
14W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%12%
2.84
3
Debbie Stewart
21W–28L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Tina Harris
0W–19L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.61
Jacqueline Lockett
12W–20L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
2.55
Gloria Byrd
9W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
38%62%<1%
2.54
2.5
Andrea Hart-Vann
2W–12L career · no lines in 2025
0%40%60%
2.54
Florastine Webster
0W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
92%8%<1%
2.30
Terri Webb
0W–8L career · no lines in 2025
97%3%<1%
2.23
2.5
Dee Carty
0W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
0%99%1%
2.15
Leilani Stamper
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Stacey Edison-Bryson
1W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.