Teams

High Strung

2022 Marion Combo 50 & Over · 7.5 Combo 50 & Over - Women

9 players · average NTRP 4.07 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-12-04vs FK - HatfieldWon 10
W#1 DoublesEileen Lombardo / Dina Sapienza vs Pamela Plumlee / Leigh McPherson6-3, 6-3
2022-12-03vs MARION/David/Women/7.5Split 11
W#1 DoublesEileen Lombardo / Dina Sapienza vs Pamelia Payne / Terri DeMartino6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesBeth Riendeau / Lori Croy vs Sarah Collinson / Judy Weber7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2022-12-03vs Villages - Eng/McCoyWon 10
W#3 DoublesEileen Lombardo / Dina Sapienza vs Jill Eng / Barbara Slavin6-3, 6-1
2022-11-27vs Villages Hoops/ParkerWon 10
W#1 DoublesDina Sapienza / Eileen Lombardo vs Judy Hoops / Elaine Parker6-2, 6-2
2022-11-13vs Villages - Perkins/PlanteWon 10
W#1 DoublesEileen Lombardo / Dina Sapienza vs Virginia Coulter-Heindl / Nancy Radzimski6-1, 6-0
2022-10-29vs SKY - ArcobelloWon 10
W#1 DoublesLori Croy / Dina Sapienza vs Kim Arcobello / Petrea Coleman6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Combo 50 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.51
Drae Centonze
published 5
3.97
Diana Royo
published 4
3.86
Eileen Lombardo
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.80
Caroline Murray
published 4
3.77
Beth Riendeau
published 4
3.54
Lori Croy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.48
Dina Sapienza
published 4
3.17
Julie Haynes
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sharon Christie Ybanez + Eileen Lombardo11557% games+7.1% vs expected
Eileen Lombardo + Dina Sapienza314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Drae Centonze
102W–22L career · no lines in 2022
47%53%<1%
4.51
4
Diana Royo
8W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%59%41%
3.97
4
Eileen Lombardo
304W–158L career · 12 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.86
4
Caroline Murray
13W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Beth Riendeau
8W–6L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
Lori Croy
75W–42L career · 4 lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.54
4
Dina Sapienza
8W–7L career · no lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
3.48
3.5
Sharon Christie Ybanez
72W–72L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
Julie Haynes
10W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.