Teams

Escambia- Falzone - PCC

2023 Escambia Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Adult 55 & Over - Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-03-29vs Wallace - RS ClayWon 21
W#1 DoublesRick Cuny / Russell Ball vs Kenneth Wallace / Brian Weil7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJohn Wimberly / Derrick Racine vs Richard Andresen / Gordon Paulus1-0
W#3 DoublesTim Falzone / Jeff Taylor vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-03-29vs Wallace - RS ClayLost 01
L#1 DoublesJohn Wimberly / Jeff Taylor vs Richard Andresen / Gordon Paulus6-1, 5-7, 0-1
2023-03-16vs Wallace - RS ClayWon 10
W#3 DoublesTim Falzone / John Wimberly vs Richard Andresen / Gordon Paulus6-3, 6-3
2023-03-04vs Wallace - RS ClayWon 10
W#1 DoublesDerrick Racine / John Wimberly vs Kenneth Wallace / Parker Thompson6-3, 6-2
2023-03-01vs Wallace - RS ClayWon 10
W#2 DoublesRick Cuny / Russell Ball vs Richard Andresen / Gordon Paulus7-6, 7-5
2023-02-22vs Wallace - RS ClaySplit 11
W#1 DoublesJohn Wimberly / Derrick Racine - * vs Kenneth Wallace / Brian Weil6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesGordon Paulus / Ali Kizilbash vs Russell Ball / Rick Cuny - *2-6, 3-6
2023-02-04vs Wallace - RS ClayWon 10
W#3 DoublesKen McCurdy / Jeff Taylor vs Gordon Paulus / Ali Kizilbash4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Adult 55 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Russ Parris
published
3.83
Rick Cuny
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.78
Jeff Taylor
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.74
Michael Yager
published
3.67
Ken McCurdy
published
3.62
Tim Falzone
published
3.31
Calvin Moore
published 3.5
John Wimberly
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Russell Ball
published
Shane Russell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tim Falzone + Calvin Moore303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Russ Parris
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
3.86
Rick Cuny
100W–65L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%90%10%
3.83
Jeff Taylor
47W–43L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.78
Michael Yager
13W–12L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.74
Ken McCurdy
18W–15L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.67
Tim Falzone
15W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%17%83%
3.62
3.5
Calvin Moore
7W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.31
John Wimberly
123W–97L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Russell Ball
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Shane Russell
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.