Teams

MTC - Huber

2023 Adult 18 & Over Women Fall Night - Mobile · 3.0 Women Night

13 players · average NTRP 2.88 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.0 Women Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Kelly Chism
published
2.92
Kathleen Rees
published
2.91
Deanne Pollara
published 3
2.88
Jan Fontenot
published
2.84
Alice Huber
published 3
2.77
Tracie Jordan
published
Debra Shirk
published 3
2.67
Lauren Carter
published
2.52
Tena Baine
published
2.49
Maureen Lowe
published
2.35
Charlotte Baker
published 2.5
Stacey Johns
published
Yulia Fedko
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jan Fontenot + Kathleen Rees4259% games+9.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelly Chism
18W–22L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.40
Kathleen Rees
18W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%28%
2.92
3
Deanne Pollara
15W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
2.91
Jan Fontenot
23W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Alice Huber
30W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%13%
2.84
Tracie Jordan
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Debra Shirk
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lauren Carter
23W–17L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
2.67
Tena Baine
12W–40L career · no lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
2.52
Maureen Lowe
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
52%48%<1%
2.49
2.5
Charlotte Baker
24W–31L career · no lines in 2023
0%86%14%
2.35
Stacey Johns
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Yulia Fedko
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.