Teams

Huguenot - Waters

2024 Duval Adult 40 & Over - Women · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over

16 players · average NTRP 3.44 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-02-29vs The Yards - JohnsonWon 10
W#1 DoublesVandi Cole / Tammy Oswald vs Kelly Sams / Colleen Sheehan4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-02-11vs Duval/DeNapoli/40&Over3.5WLost 01
L#2 DoublesTammy Oswald / Vandi Cole vs Julie DeNapoli / Irena Eneva-Kirov6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2024-01-28vs Glen Kernan - KozackWon 10
W#2 DoublesVandi Cole / Ali Hall vs Theresa Pair / Susan Day6-0, 6-0
2024-01-21vs Deercreek - BoyleWon 10
W#2 DoublesVandi Cole / Ali Hall vs Robin Braddock / Jody Layne6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Ali Hall
published 4
3.44
Manisha Valentin
published
3.44
Aura Bernal
published 3.5
3.40
Vandi Cole
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.38
Carol Kelley
published 3.5
3.35
Tina Toomey
published
3.33
Diane Stone
published 3.5
3.24
Elizabeth Messina
published 3.5
3.22
Tammy Oswald
published
3.17
Sarah Davidson
published
3.08
Cheryl Matthews
published 3
3.07
Erin Wolf
published 3.5
3.04
Judith Daniel
published
2.76
Debbie Bucca
published 3
Rhonda Sutaria
published
Virginia Waters
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tammy Oswald + Vandi Cole7548% games−1.3% vs expected
Elizabeth Messina + Diane Stone1436% gamesnot enough data
Aura Bernal + Diane Stone4158% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth Messina + Manisha Valentin123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ali Hall
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
2%95%3%
3.75
Manisha Valentin
21W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Aura Bernal
23W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.44
Vandi Cole
78W–46L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Carol Kelley
24W–21L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.38
Tina Toomey
6W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Diane Stone
24W–20L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Elizabeth Messina
10W–24L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.24
Tammy Oswald
18W–19L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%2%
3.22
Sarah Davidson
15W–8L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.17
3
Cheryl Matthews
7W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%27%73%
3.08
3.5
Erin Wolf
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.07
Judith Daniel
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.04
3
Debbie Bucca
9W–10L career · no lines in 2024
2%95%3%
2.76
Rhonda Sutaria
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Virginia Waters
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.