Teams

GEPTA/Adult 3.5W/Abbud/CCC#2

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

17 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEPTA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2025 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Berenice Loubet
usually #2 Doubles 31%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published 3.5
3.13
Claudia Abbud
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published 3.5
Elva Malooly
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Fadia Ghaleb
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Felisa Fuentes
usually #1 Doubles 52%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Georgina Munoz
usually #1 Doubles 28%, also #3 Doubles 28% · published
Kristine Garcia
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Lia Davalos
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Lluvia Bordier
usually #1 Singles 35%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Marcia Zaragoza
usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published
Maria Baeza
usually #1 Doubles 52%, also #3 Doubles 24% · published
Mariaelena Sozer
published
Martha Canales
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
Maya I Quevedo
usually #1 Singles 64%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published
Melissa Isaac
usually #1 Doubles 54%, also #2 Doubles 34% · published
Olga Carrasco
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
Sarvelia Diaz
usually #3 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Claudia Abbud + Georgina Munoz41539% games+0.5% vs expected
Claudia Abbud + Olga Carrasco3940% games−6.0% vs expected
Marcia Zaragoza + Sarvelia Diaz4545% games−6.2% vs expected
Maria Baeza + Felisa Fuentes12355% gamesnot enough data
Elva Malooly + Sarvelia Diaz6848% gamesnot enough data
Melissa Isaac + Martha Canales6647% gamesnot enough data
Melissa Isaac + Sarvelia Diaz4646% gamesnot enough data
Claudia Abbud + Melissa Isaac3643% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Berenice Loubet
32W–31L career · 16 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Claudia Abbud
55W–104L career · 20 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.13
Elva Malooly
23W–53L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Fadia Ghaleb
13W–31L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data
Felisa Fuentes
57W–22L career · 27 lines in 2025
not enough data
Georgina Munoz
35W–78L career · 17 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristine Garcia
23W–25L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lia Davalos
24W–52L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lluvia Bordier
37W–21L career · 16 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marcia Zaragoza
36W–64L career · 13 lines in 2025
not enough data
Maria Baeza
58W–35L career · 24 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mariaelena Sozer
22W–17L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Martha Canales
59W–51L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Maya I Quevedo
29W–36L career · 11 lines in 2025
not enough data
Melissa Isaac
107W–104L career · 35 lines in 2025
not enough data
Olga Carrasco
32W–44L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sarvelia Diaz
49W–87L career · 15 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.