Teams

ANTELOPE TA/ANTELOPE COMMUNITY PK CW6.5A

2025 COMBO · Women 6.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-10-10vs LAGUNA CREEK CW6.5ALost 03
L#1 DoublesDenise Canacari / Laurie Walker vs Alyssa Archerda / Ann Gudmann2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDeanne Binon / Suzette Olsen vs JoAnn Jaschke / Heather Craig0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCarmel Lindner / Olena Rogers vs Leslie Matthews / Joanne Huang0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Jill Mahoney
published
3.38
Rachel Leung
published
3.24
Marigold Nabong
published
3.20
Denise Canacari
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Rebecca Domeier
published
3.17
Hee-Sook Koenig
published
3.17
Susie O'Brien
published
3.14
Kateryna Elitzin
published
3.10
Gabi Stallings
published
3.10
Brenda Romero
published 3
3.10
Carmel Lindner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Elvamae Frofunga
published
2.84
Marion Sanders
published
2.76
Suzette Olsen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Laurie Walker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.61
Deanne Binon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.58
Olena Rogers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brenda Romero + Kateryna Elitzin314 matchesnot enough data
Marigold Nabong + Gabi Stallings123 matchesnot enough data
Marion Sanders + Susie O'Brien303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jill Mahoney
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%27%
3.42
Rachel Leung
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Marigold Nabong
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Denise Canacari
13W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Rebecca Domeier
14W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.20
Hee-Sook Koenig
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Susie O'Brien
9W–8L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Kateryna Elitzin
31W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
3.14
Gabi Stallings
4W–11L career · no lines in 2025
23%76%<1%
3.10
3
Brenda Romero
18W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.10
3.5
Carmel Lindner
2W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.10
Elvamae Frofunga
3W–9L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05
Marion Sanders
13W–17L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
Suzette Olsen
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
96%4%<1%
2.76
Laurie Walker
3W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Deanne Binon
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.61
Olena Rogers
2W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
28%72%<1%
2.58

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.