Teams

Miller

2025 FW Combo Tournament · 7.5 Ladies

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-05-25vs AndersonWon 21
L#1 DoublesJulie Fidler / Becki Miles vs Jenna Xiong / Donna Schoolfield3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKimberly Muller / Shelley Duron vs Lori Sciremammano / Vicki Rose6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesKelly McCullough / Amy Whitehead vs Sandra Anderson / Julie Evans6-2, 6-3
2025-05-24vs HudnallLost 12
L#1 DoublesJulie Fidler / Becki Miles vs Judy Watts / Lynn Jumper2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHope Miller / Shelley Duron vs Angela Rosenbaum / Kelsey Jackson3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTanya Teeter / Shannon Forbus vs Jennifer McNamara / Thao Tran1-5
2025-05-24vs TebeauxLost 02
L#1 DoublesKimberly Muller / Shelley Duron vs Cayla Jackson / Blair Small3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKelly McCullough / Amy Whitehead vs Gilda Tebeaux / Cynthia Cordial2-6, 3-6
2025-05-23vs MooreLost 12
L#1 DoublesTanya Teeter / Renee Yackira vs Allison Nicks / Lori Bennett4-6, 4-4
L#2 DoublesKelly McCullough / Amy Whitehead vs Annette Baker / Jill Moore4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesKimberly Muller / Becki Miles vs Angela Uptmore / Stacy Burdick6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Ladies have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Kelly McCullough
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.52
Hope Miller
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Tanya Teeter
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Becki Miles
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Renee Yackira
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Shelley Duron
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.06
Amy Whitehead
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Julie Fidler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kimberly Muller
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Shannon Forbus
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Whitehead + Kelly McCullough123 matchesnot enough data
Julie Fidler + Becki Miles033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelly McCullough
17W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Hope Miller
9W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.52
Tanya Teeter
1W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
91%9%<1%
3.31
3.5
Becki Miles
1W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Renee Yackira
25W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Shelley Duron
19W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Amy Whitehead
1W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.06
Julie Fidler
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kimberly Muller
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Shannon Forbus
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.