Teams

Buckhorn Double Troubles - Seitzinger

2026 Hillsborough Mixed 40 & Over · 6.0 Mixed 40 and Over

14 players · average NTRP 2.93 / REGION_3

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 6.0 Mixed 40 and Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Jon Brown
published
3.07
Ann Dunleavy
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3
3.06
Daniel Espinoza
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.90
Haney Song
published 3
2.87
Shawn Rasmussen
published
2.82
Susan MOSHER
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published
2.81
Don Valenti
published 3
2.79
Colin Clark
published 3
2.73
Maria Karina Espinoza
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.72
Jordan Murray
published
2.58
Latoya Carter
published
2.54
Renee Rasmussen
published
2.44
Barbara Murray
published 3
2.43
Amy Breck
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jon Brown + Amy Breck3345% games−19.3% vs expected
Renee Rasmussen + Shawn Rasmussen123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jon Brown
4W–6L career · no lines in 2026
61%39%<1%
3.46
3
Ann Dunleavy
41W–18L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%28%72%
3.07
3
Daniel Espinoza
11W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.06
3
Haney Song
19W–7L career · no lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.90
Shawn Rasmussen
15W–22L career · no lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
2.87
Susan MOSHER
16W–18L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Don Valenti
7W–3L career · no lines in 2026
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Colin Clark
3W–5L career · no lines in 2026
1%94%5%
2.79
Maria Karina Espinoza
12W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
Jordan Murray
3W–10L career · no lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.72
Latoya Carter
7W–9L career · no lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
2.58
Renee Rasmussen
11W–19L career · no lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
2.54
3
Barbara Murray
5W–11L career · type A · no lines in 2026
68%32%<1%
2.44
2.5
Amy Breck
12W–16L career · no lines in 2026
0%71%29%
2.43

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.