Teams

Southampton Lane

2022 Richmond Tri-Level 18 & Over Weekday · Richmond Tri-Level 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Weekday

9 players · average NTRP 4.40 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-10-28vs CCV CooperSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCherie Lane / Laura Earley vs Beth Robbins / Sarah O'Neill4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJeanine Wisor / Elana Bowman vs Susan Trigg / Jennifer Bencks6-1, 6-4
2022-10-21vs Westwood HauseLost 01
L#1 DoublesCourtney Greiner / Carol Gregory vs Anna Shea / Clara Laing0-6, 6-7
2022-10-14vs Hermitage HolmesWon 20
W#1 DoublesCherie Lane / Courtney Greiner vs Pamela Luse / Margaret Crosby6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJeanine Wisor / Elana Bowman vs Ashley Evans / Aynsley Fisher6-4, 6-1
2022-10-12vs SCC CapozelloLost 01
L#1 DoublesCourtney Greiner / Carol Gregory vs Tracy Buzzeo / Nina Sjogren4-6, 6-7
2022-10-07vs Raintree MorrisWon 20
W#1 DoublesCourtney Greiner / Carol Gregory vs Lauren McCormick / Angela Verdery6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJeanine Wisor / Elana Bowman vs Kimberly Kimball / Kerry Torres6-2, 6-2
2022-09-16vs WOCC SmithWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarol Gregory / Laura Earley vs Kelly Stalls / Kathryn Brotherton7-6, 6-4
2022-09-09vs CCV DeLaceyWon 10
W#1 DoublesCourtney Greiner / Carol Gregory vs Esther Fratkin / Katie Willett6-1, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Tri-Level 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Weekday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.86 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Brooke Kelly
published 4.5
4.13
Courtney Greiner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.08
Laura Earley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.89
Carol Gregory
published 4.5
3.78
Jeanine Wisor
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Rebecca Morgan
published
3.69
Natalie Dunton
published
3.21
Victoria Galiffa
published
Julie Ruth
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brooke Kelly
5W–3L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
Courtney Greiner
117W–118L career · 5 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
4.13
4.5
Laura Earley
83W–52L career · 2 lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
4.08
4.5
Carol Gregory
5W–2L career · no lines in 2022
80%20%<1%
3.89
4
Jeanine Wisor
113W–86L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.78
Rebecca Morgan
15W–7L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
Natalie Dunton
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Victoria Galiffa
10W–5L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
Julie Ruth
3W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.