Teams

HOA/Gifford/55&over9.0W

2026 HOA Adult 55 & Over 6.0 - 9.0 · 9.0 Combo - Women - 55

14 players · average NTRP 4.33 / HEART OF AMERICA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-14vs McCulloch, DawnaWon 30
W#1 DoublesValerie Marks / Allyson Braun vs Carolyn Huffman / Mindy Stewart6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLara Maple / Jackie Gehrke vs Nikki Sims / Jenny Arbanas6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDonna Wyse / Susan Doerr vs Pamela Kopplin / Karen Phillips6-3, 6-3
2026-06-07vs Griffey, JacqueWon 30
W#1 DoublesTracey Johnson / Diane Kakareka vs Jacque Griffey / Allison Salmon3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDonna Wyse / Lorie Zacharias-Verdi vs Susan Schwerdtfeger / Diane Werner6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMichelle Gifford / Anne Hope vs Brook Vitt / Sharon Cornolo6-1, 6-2
2026-05-17vs McCulloch, DawnaWon 21
W#1 DoublesJackie Gehrke / Susan Doerr vs Dawna McCulloch / Carolyn Huffman6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesThresa Lampe / Carol Creel vs Leslie Addadi / Pamela Kopplin6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLara Maple / Allyson Braun vs Renetta Ramsdell / Amy Fangman3-6, 1-6
2026-05-09vs Griffey, JacqueWon 21
L#1 DoublesMichelle Gifford / Carol Creel vs Chriss Shoup-Duntz / Brook Vitt4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesLara Maple / Diane Kakareka vs Jennifer VanMeter / Cathy Hurst6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLorie Zacharias-Verdi / Linda Johnson vs Allison Salmon / Chan Townsend6-0, 6-4
2026-04-19vs McCulloch, DawnaWon 30
W#1 DoublesTracey Johnson / Jill Waldman vs Renetta Ramsdell / Tracy Cooper6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDonna Wyse / Susan Doerr vs Carolyn Huffman / Cynthia Kuhlman6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesThresa Lampe / Diane Kakareka vs Deborah Fabrizius / Jennifer Byers6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2026-04-12vs Griffey, JacqueWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnne Hope / Jill Waldman vs Jennifer VanMeter / Chan Townsend6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAllyson Braun / Valerie Marks vs Lisa Cummings / Cathy Hurst6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJackie Gehrke / Linda Johnson vs Brook Vitt / Linda Case6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 9.0 Combo - Women - 55
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HOA/Gifford/55&over9.0W601626104
2McCulloch, Dawna1561224166

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.05 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.64
Jill Waldman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.55
Valerie Marks
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.37
Michelle Gifford
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.32
Thresa Lampe
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.24
Diane Kakareka
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.24
Lorie Zacharias-Verdi
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.17
Jackie Gehrke
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
3.88
Susan Doerr
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.81
Anne Hope
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.79
Donna Wyse
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.75
Tracey Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.69
Allyson Braun
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.66
Carol Creel
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.55
Lara Maple
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jackie Gehrke + Susan Doerr12069% games+8.6% vs expected
Jackie Gehrke + Michelle Gifford10164% games+4.1% vs expected
Valerie Marks + Lorie Zacharias-Verdi111254% games+0.7% vs expected
Thresa Lampe + Michelle Gifford9553% games−0.1% vs expected
Thresa Lampe + Valerie Marks6748% games−1.6% vs expected
Jackie Gehrke + Diane Kakareka3651% games−8.6% vs expected
Valerie Marks + Diane Kakareka4161% gamesnot enough data
Anne Hope + Jill Waldman404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Jill Waldman
55W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.64
Valerie Marks
83W–45L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.55
Michelle Gifford
126W–54L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.37
Thresa Lampe
80W–39L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
4.32
4.5
Diane Kakareka
36W–36L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%92%3%
4.24
4.5
Lorie Zacharias-Verdi
101W–79L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
4.24
Jackie Gehrke
136W–81L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
4.17
Susan Doerr
109W–32L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.88
4
Anne Hope
112W–53L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.81
Donna Wyse
155W–32L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%2%98%
3.79
Tracey Johnson
48W–45L career · 5 lines in 2026
96%4%<1%
3.75
4
Allyson Braun
126W–89L career · 6 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Carol Creel
11W–12L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.66
Lara Maple
109W–84L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%35%65%
3.55

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.