Teams

Houck/Knoxville/C55

2022 Combo 55 & Over- Knoxville · 7.5 55 & Over Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.79 / TENNESSEE

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 7.5 55 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Angela Strange
published 4
Cecilia Lowrey
published 4
3.48
Debbie Shoemaker
published 4
3.47
Eve Tang
published 4
3.42
Debi Houck
published 3.5
3.39
3.35
Laura Ivey
published
3.25
Teresa Helton
published
3.18
Stacy Carlson
published
3.12
Sandy Hodson
published
3.10
Donna Worrell
published 3.5
2.79
Terri Bowers
published
Jenifer Zeno
published
Margie Hensley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angela Strange + Stacy Carlson14754% games+5.0% vs expected
Gabriela Vidal de Ramirez + Stacy Carlson4450% games−3.1% vs expected
Laura Ivey + Debbie Shoemaker314 matchesnot enough data
Teresa Helton + Debi Houck314 matchesnot enough data
Teresa Helton + Debbie Shoemaker123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Angela Strange
56W–40L career · no lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
3.91
4
Cecilia Lowrey
2W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Debbie Shoemaker
17W–19L career · no lines in 2022
57%43%<1%
3.48
4
Eve Tang
18W–28L career · type A · no lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
3.47
3.5
Debi Houck
21W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Gabriela Vidal de Ramirez
35W–21L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.39
Laura Ivey
11W–33L career · no lines in 2022
87%13%<1%
3.35
Teresa Helton
29W–19L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Stacy Carlson
44W–40L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
Sandy Hodson
12W–21L career · no lines in 2022
17%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Donna Worrell
21W–27L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
Terri Bowers
6W–13L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
2.79
Jenifer Zeno
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Margie Hensley
7W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.