Teams

BTC:Bloomfield Bobcats:Datsko/

2025 NCT Adult 18 & Over Men · 5.0 Adult Men 1

9 players · average NTRP 4.67 / NORTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-05-17vs RFL:Racquets for Life:Burda/Won 10
W#1 DoublesDouglas Bracken / Jeff White vs Brian Boyle / Carlos Salmon6-4, 6-4
2025-04-05vs RFL:Racquets for Life:Burda/Split 11
W#1 DoublesDouglas Bracken / Rostyk Datsko vs Jeffrey Bowers / Carlos Salmon6-0, 6-1
L#1 SinglesJeff White vs Reid Risinger1-6, 2-6
2025-02-01vs RFL:Racquets for Life:Burda/Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJohn Megas / Christopher Barnhart vs Christian Coley / Matthew Urbanetti5-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesEthan Na vs Reid Risinger3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRostyk Datsko / Jeff White vs James Burda / Jeffrey Bowers2-6, 6-3, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0 Adult Men 1 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.32 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.63
Douglas Bracken
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.61
Alex Gaal
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 5
4.42
Adam Weinstein
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.40
Rostyk Datsko
usually #1 Doubles 81%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
4.36
Ethan Na
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.32
Christopher Barnhart
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
3.99
Jeff White
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.83
Stefan Jones
usually #2 Doubles 53%, also #1 Singles 24% · published
John Megas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rostyk Datsko + Stefan Jones5166% games+17.5% vs expected
Christopher Barnhart + John Megas8749% games−3.5% vs expected
Rostyk Datsko + Alex Gaal123 matchesnot enough data
Rostyk Datsko + Christopher Barnhart303 matchesnot enough data
Rostyk Datsko + John Megas213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Douglas Bracken
51W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.63
5
Alex Gaal
8W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.61
4.5
Adam Weinstein
88W–36L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
4.42
Rostyk Datsko
96W–45L career · 16 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
4.40
Ethan Na
63W–39L career · 12 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
4.36
4.5
Christopher Barnhart
17W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
4.32
Jeff White
14W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
3.99
Stefan Jones
85W–35L career · 17 lines in 2025
89%11%<1%
3.83
John Megas
12W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.