Teams

Bake-LLW-Team Broussard-Ames

2025 Adult 40 & Over - Bakersfield · Women's 4.0 - Bake

11 players · average NTRP 4.08 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-03-09vs Bake - Team Oh-mazingWon 10
W#1 DoublesSally Goossen / Beth van Voorhis vs Hyejung Oh / Ashley South2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-02-23vs Bake - Team Oh-mazingSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBeth van Voorhis / Sara Paul vs Laura Amason / Linette Holliday6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesBriana Starr / Lauren Eittreim vs Becca Ferguson / Victoria Seaman2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-01-26vs Bake - Team Oh-mazingLost 01
L#2 DoublesLiza Chen / Beth van Voorhis vs Hyejung Oh / Ashley South1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-01-12vs Bake - Team Oh-mazingWon 20
W#1 DoublesBeth van Voorhis / Sally Goossen vs SENEA GARRIQUEZ / Linette Holliday6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesHeather Tkac / Briana Starr vs Becca Ferguson / Victoria Seaman6-2, 6-3
2025-01-05vs Bake - Team Oh-mazingWon 10
W#1 DoublesBeth van Voorhis / Sally Goossen vs Hyejung Oh / Ashley South6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 4.0 - Bake have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Cindy Broussard
published 4.5
3.86
Briana Starr
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.76
Nikki Hiebert
published
3.74
Heather Tkac
published
3.73
Beth van Voorhis
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.62
Liza Chen
published
3.60
Lauren Eittreim
published 4
3.49
Sara Paul
published
3.42
Amy Meger
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.40
Sally Goossen
published
3.13
Andrea Ames
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Briana Starr + Lauren Eittreim33365% games+7.8% vs expected
Heather Tkac + Sally Goossen4255% games+2.4% vs expected
Beth van Voorhis + Sally Goossen123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cindy Broussard
8W–2L career · no lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
3.94
4
Briana Starr
70W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.86
Nikki Hiebert
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.76
Heather Tkac
11W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%4%96%
3.74
4
Beth van Voorhis
39W–22L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Liza Chen
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.62
4
Lauren Eittreim
57W–11L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
Sara Paul
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.49
4
Amy Meger
10W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
72%28%<1%
3.42
Sally Goossen
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.40
4
Andrea Ames
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.