Teams

*5-SRyan-CHTC

2024 Eno River Adult 40 & Over · 40 & Over Adult 4.0 Men Evening

12 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-05-23vs *6-DHenley-HVCCWon 10
W#1 DoublesJOE BERTON / Nathan Bearman vs Justin Nixon / Bryson Powell7-6, 6-3
2024-05-07vs *3-DBaddour-CHCCLost 01
L#1 DoublesJOE BERTON / Nathan Bearman vs Paul Hodulik / Christian Shelby2-6, 2-6
2024-04-16vs *4-SPerian-EnoWon 10
W#1 DoublesJOE BERTON / Nathan Bearman vs Rahul Narang / Praveen Krishnamurthy5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2024-03-26vs *3-DBaddour-CHCCLost 01
L#2 DoublesNathan Bearman / Jacob Godfrey vs Christian Shelby / Brian Jenkins1-6, 4-6
2024-03-19vs *1-EAnderson-DFCLost 01
L#2 DoublesTerrence Tan / Nathan Bearman vs Edward Anderson / Charles Wood0-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-03-12vs *2-MYoung UNC-4.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesNathan Bearman / Terrence Tan vs Barry Gooch / Laurence Isaacs6-7, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 4.0 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Nathan Bearman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.75
Wendell Gilland
published
3.66
Terrence Tan
published
3.65
JOE BERTON
published
3.63
Stephen Stark
published
3.61
Matthew Curry
published
3.40
Randy Cubrilovic
published
3.34
Jacob Godfrey
published
3.32
Dan Tudor
published 3.5
3.26
Jeffrey Kopf
published
3.23
Donovan Khamphasong
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Stephen Ryan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Terrence Tan + Wendell Gilland123 matchesnot enough data
Nathan Bearman + Donovan Khamphasong033 matchesnot enough data
Matthew Curry + Wendell Gilland213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Nathan Bearman
118W–60L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%84%16%
3.86
Wendell Gilland
12W–7L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.75
Terrence Tan
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.66
JOE BERTON
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.65
Stephen Stark
5W–9L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.63
Matthew Curry
29W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%22%78%
3.61
Randy Cubrilovic
11W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.40
Jacob Godfrey
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Dan Tudor
6W–2L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
Jeffrey Kopf
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.26
3.5
Donovan Khamphasong
54W–68L career · 1 line in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
Stephen Ryan
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.