Teams

New Territory - Slice Girls

*2026 Houston Fall League (2025)NA Friday Ladies Day League · 3.5 Ladies Doubles

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-21vs Sugar Creek - Sugar & SliceWon 30
W#1 DoublesConnie Esposito / Suzanne Hanse vs Katie Billing / Vivian MacDonnell6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesClaudia Bravo Becerra / Maria Fernanda Aller vs Carla Brock / Janet Carpenter6-2, 6-2
W#4 DoublesNoune Kirakosian / Jennifer Blackmer vs Debbie Jacobson / Nina Kuhn6-1, 6-2
2025-11-14vs Cinco Ranch Westridge - Wild CardsSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJanet Beaver / Neha Parikh vs Marilyn Flores / Tracy Rolling6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKaren Carothers / Claudia Bravo Becerra vs Vicki Galloway / Patricia Davey3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMonique Abernathy / Karin Thornton vs Nora Lebedzinski / Carmen Navarro2-6, 2-6
W#4 DoublesJennifer Blackmer / Sheri Dempsey vs Marien Borges / Linda van Brunt6-0, 6-3
2025-10-31vs Sweetwater - Game Set LunchLost 03
L#1 DoublesJanet Beaver / Neha Parikh vs Britny Trevino / Thais White3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesConnie Esposito / Claudia Bravo Becerra vs Anna Kelley / Kerri Ross2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMonique Abernathy / Karin Thornton vs Kathleen Rosseland / Luana Pereira1-6, 0-6
2025-10-23vs Willowfork - Fork Em UpSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJanet Beaver / Connie Esposito vs Kim Saccone / Lindsay Catterall7-6, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMaria Fernanda Aller / Claudia Bravo Becerra vs Kate Olsen / Nathalie Tirtiaux7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesNoune Kirakosian / Jennifer Blackmer vs Maggy Britton / Kristin McWilliams3-6, 3-6
L#4 DoublesKaren Carothers / Sheri Dempsey vs Catherine Popovici / Geeta Parmar-patel7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-10-17vs Sugar Creek - Sugar & SliceWon 21
W#1 DoublesConnie Esposito / Suzanne Hanse vs Gaylin Fagan / Lizabeth Herrera6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesNeha Parikh / Monique Abernathy vs Janet Carpenter / Carla Brock6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKarin Thornton / Sheri Dempsey vs Katie Billing / Erin Salinas3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 DoublesJanet Beaver / Neha Parikh vs Vicki Galloway / Vibeke Ryan6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMary Ann Asnaashari / Claudia Bravo Becerra vs Katherine Shade / Tracy Rolling3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesSheri Dempsey / Maria Fernanda Aller vs Jennifer Card / Nora Lebedzinski6-4, 6-2
W#4 DoublesKaren Carothers / Monique Abernathy vs Marilyn Flores / Linda van Brunt6-2, 6-4
2025-09-26vs Sweetwater - Game Set LunchLost 04
L#1 DoublesJanet Beaver / Connie Esposito vs Monica Rayburn / Britny Trevino3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesClaudia Bravo Becerra / Monique Abernathy vs Viviana Corredor / Kerri Ross5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSheri Dempsey / Jennifer Blackmer vs Anna Kelley / Luana Pereira1-6, 2-6
L#4 DoublesMaria Fernanda Aller / Karen Carothers vs Rosemary Williams / Tina Nguyen2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-09-19vs Willowfork - Fork Em UpWon 31
W#1 DoublesJanet Beaver / Neha Parikh vs Lindsay Catterall / Kim Saccone7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMary Ann Asnaashari / Claudia Bravo Becerra vs Nathalie Tirtiaux / Catherine Popovici6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMaria Fernanda Aller / Sheri Dempsey vs Maggy Britton / Katherine Rowe1-6, 2-6
W#4 DoublesKaren Carothers / Karin Thornton vs Geeta Parmar-patel / Jolena Tu4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Ladies Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Janet Beaver
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Suzanne Hanse
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.29
Karen Carothers
usually #4 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.22
Mary Ann Asnaashari
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Claudia Bravo Becerra
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Connie Esposito
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.19
Sheri Dempsey
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
3.17
Jennifer Blackmer
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.09
Maria Fernanda Aller
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.01
Noune Kirakosian
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.96
Monique Abernathy
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.90
Karin Thornton
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published
Neha Parikh
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Connie Esposito + Suzanne Hanse5165% games+12.2% vs expected
Connie Esposito + Janet Beaver10652% games+3.7% vs expected
Mary Ann Asnaashari + Monique Abernathy3249% games−0.5% vs expected
Mary Ann Asnaashari + Janet Beaver3346% games−10.9% vs expected
Mary Ann Asnaashari + Connie Esposito3352% gamesnot enough data
Neha Parikh + Monique Abernathy224 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Blackmer + Sheri Dempsey134 matchesnot enough data
Janet Beaver + Monique Abernathy123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Janet Beaver
67W–32L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.41
Suzanne Hanse
17W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%75%24%
3.40
Karen Carothers
3W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.29
Mary Ann Asnaashari
53W–61L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Claudia Bravo Becerra
14W–13L career · 7 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Connie Esposito
39W–29L career · 5 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.19
Sheri Dempsey
5W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
Jennifer Blackmer
12W–27L career · 4 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.17
Maria Fernanda Aller
9W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.09
Noune Kirakosian
2W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
3.01
Monique Abernathy
13W–19L career · 5 lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
2.96
Karin Thornton
2W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
76%24%<1%
2.90
Neha Parikh
23W–14L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.