Teams

Oak Creek/Cai-Chen M4.5

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S M. League

13 players · average NTRP 4.17 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-06-22vs Greenhill/Kanchi M4.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesCheng Wang / Vito Nguyen vs Enrique Pujol / Michael Torres1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDexter Chen / GEORGE GUU vs Vishnu Basude / Jacob Nelson3-6, 3-6
2025-06-15vs Canyon Creek/Robins M4.5Won 20
W#1 SinglesManyang Sun vs Blair Mathews6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesVito Nguyen / Shaoli Fang vs William Ragle / Carl Cotter6-4, 6-3
2025-06-08vs Oak Creek/Dewan M4.5Lost 01
L#2 SinglesDexter Chen vs William Lord7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2025-05-18vs Seay/Byrd-Orsak M4.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesDongxiao Liu / Cheng Wang vs Dan Eynon / Olafallart Gipon1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesChristopher Brown / Daniel Lv vs Jeff Darnell / Owen Morris1-6, 1-6
2025-04-27vs Fretz/Conwill-Patel M4.5Split 11
W#1 DoublesYANGWEI CAI / Christopher Brown vs Mike Kojder / Viswa Sundaresan7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesManyang Sun vs Hunter Kael5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for S M. League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Avinash Maddineni
published 4.5
Connor Crumly
published 4.5
3.88
Balaji Krishnaswamy
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.77
Cheng Wang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Daniel Lv
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Dongxiao Liu
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.54
Dexter Chen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
GEORGE GUU
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Manyang Sun
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Shaoli Fang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Vito Nguyen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
YANGWEI CAI
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Zhangji Chen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dongxiao Liu + Balaji Krishnaswamy1437% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Avinash Maddineni
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Connor Crumly
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Balaji Krishnaswamy
10W–17L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.88
4
Cheng Wang
6W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Daniel Lv
2W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
9%89%1%
3.69
Dongxiao Liu
13W–24L career · 6 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.63
4
Dexter Chen
0W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.54
GEORGE GUU
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Manyang Sun
1W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Shaoli Fang
5W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Vito Nguyen
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
YANGWEI CAI
1W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Zhangji Chen
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.