Teams

GF:The Hit Men:Aron/Wasterlain

2026 ECT Adult 55 & Over Men · 6.0 Men 1

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesPatrick Haren / Michael Caty vs Jeff Scheckwitz / Craig DuBosar3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJean-Michel Wasterlain / Domenic Giudice vs Steven Johnson / Tim Curtin2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMark Aron / Neal Thomas vs James Craffey / M Strafaci1-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesPatrick Haren / Michael Caty vs EARL Smith / Peter Anastas6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesNeal Thomas / Mark Aron vs Rich Clippinger / M Strafaci2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesJean-Michel Wasterlain / Claude Wasterlain vs Paul Raimondi / Clive Thomas3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 DoublesPatrick Haren / James Whelan vs EARL Smith / Jeff Scheckwitz5-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Caty / Mark Aron vs Rich Clippinger / Craig DuBosar6-7, 6-6
L#3 DoublesNeal Thomas / Daniel Fisher vs Tim Curtin / James Craffey1-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesPatrick Haren / James Whelan vs EARL Smith / James Hawxhurst2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMark Aron / Jean-Michel Wasterlain vs Steven Johnson / Peter Anastas1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesClaude Wasterlain / John Cleary vs Tim Curtin / Paul Luner1-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesJean-Michel Wasterlain / Patrick Haren vs Jeff Scheckwitz / Craig DuBosar3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMark Aron / Michael Caty vs Paul Raimondi / James Craffey5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNeal Thomas / James Whelan vs Tom Lee / Clive Thomas7-6, 6-0
L#1 DoublesDomenic Giudice / Patrick Haren vs Rich Clippinger / James Hawxhurst0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMichael Caty / Jean-Michel Wasterlain vs Peter Anastas / Steven Johnson7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJohn Cleary / Daniel Fisher vs Paul Luner / Clive Thomas3-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesPatrick Haren / Jim McEwen vs James Hawxhurst / EARL Smith4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJean-Michel Wasterlain / Michael Caty vs Craig DuBosar / Paul Raimondi6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMark Aron / Neal Thomas vs M Strafaci / Tom Lee6-2, 6-2
W#1 DoublesPatrick Haren / Jim McEwen vs Jeff Scheckwitz / Steven Johnson7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJames Whelan / David Russell vs James Craffey / Peter Anastas7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMark Aron / Claude Wasterlain vs Tim Curtin / Paul Luner2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 6.0 Men 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LS:The Remains:Clippinger/Hawxhurst08141021201
2GF:The Hit Men:Aron/Wasterlain08101431244

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Michael Caty
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.90
Jean-Michel Wasterlain
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
2.84
Neal Thomas
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.83
Patrick Haren
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
David Russell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.66
Mark Aron
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
2.61
Domenic Giudice
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.56
Claude Wasterlain
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.41
Daniel Fisher
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
James Whelan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Jim McEwen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patrick Haren + Domenic Giudice9653% games−2.1% vs expected
Jean-Michel Wasterlain + Michael Caty6260% gamesnot enough data
Claude Wasterlain + Jean-Michel Wasterlain2446% gamesnot enough data
Jim McEwen + Patrick Haren224 matchesnot enough data
Patrick Haren + James Whelan224 matchesnot enough data
Mark Aron + Jean-Michel Wasterlain044 matchesnot enough data
Mark Aron + Neal Thomas224 matchesnot enough data
Patrick Haren + Michael Caty303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Caty
14W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
2.92
Jean-Michel Wasterlain
21W–23L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90
Neal Thomas
6W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%87%13%
2.84
Patrick Haren
37W–26L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
3
David Russell
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Mark Aron
33W–62L career · 7 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
2.66
Domenic Giudice
25W–33L career · 2 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
2.61
3
Claude Wasterlain
2W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
2.56
3
Daniel Fisher
0W–4L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
74%26%<1%
2.41
James Whelan
9W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jim McEwen
13W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.