Teams

Lake Cyrus - Davis

2025 B'ham Spring - 55 & Over Weekday Women, 1:30 pm · 3.5 Women Monday

9 players · average NTRP 3.38 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-02-20vs TRC- Wade/RussellLost 03
L#1 DoublesNancy Cunningham / Cynthia Taylor vs Joni Roberson / Julie Jolley2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesKaren Brown / Becci Hauser vs Pam Spooner Wade / Lisa Beam3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCarol Mills / Cynthia Walker vs Hollie Durbin / Joanie Waldron0-6, 5-7
W#1 DoublesKelly Verzino / Nancy Cunningham vs Betty Austin / Carolyn Inscho6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCindy Yarbrough / Cynthia Taylor vs Teri Lott / Cecilia Russell6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCynthia Walker / Karen Brown vs Alana Salter / Delinda Abercrombie6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women Monday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Becci Hauser
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Cindy Yarbrough
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Gwenn McKenzie
published
3.13
Gwen Ringo
published
2.96
Lynne Tiffin
published
2.92
Cynthia Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.91
Dindy Davis
published
2.90
Kelly Verzino
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Cynthia Walker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Becci Hauser + Gwenn McKenzie2353% games−4.9% vs expected
Gwen Ringo + Cynthia Walker134 matchesnot enough data
Cindy Yarbrough + Cynthia Taylor123 matchesnot enough data
Dindy Davis + Kelly Verzino123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Becci Hauser
5W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Cindy Yarbrough
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Gwenn McKenzie
5W–12L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Gwen Ringo
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
Lynne Tiffin
14W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
2.96
3
Cynthia Taylor
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.92
Dindy Davis
2W–10L career · no lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
2.91
Kelly Verzino
14W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.90
3.5
Cynthia Walker
5W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
85%15%<1%
2.86

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.