Teams

KCarson-UNC

2025 Eno River Adult 55 & Over · 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Women Day

9 players · average NTRP 3.30 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-05-02vs NPike-HVCCWon 10
W#1 DoublesHeather Kane / Jean Haas vs Nancy Pike / Jennifer Pyle6-2, 6-2
2025-04-25vs JHagerty-YMCAWon 10
W#1 DoublesDonna Heider / Marti Jenkins vs Elaine Bardes / Karen Heinemann6-2, 6-1
2025-04-23vs SHerring-HRWon 21
L#1 DoublesMarti Jenkins / Donna Heider vs Sheana Funkhouser / Karin Yoch1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJean Haas / Heather Kane vs Nancy Riefkohl / Wendy McCorkle6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAmy Tiemann / Lisa Saenz vs Kaye Culler / Linda Sheldon6-2, 6-3
2025-04-18vs MSnow-HSWon 10
W#1 DoublesMarti Jenkins / Donna Heider vs Diane Adams / Donna Holtaway6-1, 6-3
2025-03-28vs VHiguchi-CHTCWon 10
W#2 DoublesCora Darrah / Maria Hernandez vs Sheila Newton / Denise Corey6-3, 6-2
2025-03-21vs MFitzgerald-ENOLost 01
L#3 DoublesKit Carson / Cora Darrah vs Lysa Stylski / Harriet Wilson2-6, 1-6
2025-03-14vs KHoekstra-HRLost 02
L#1 DoublesJean Haas / Lisa Saenz vs Deborah Garbee / Kateri Hoekstra0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMaria Hernandez / Cora Darrah vs Karen Sindelar / Pamela Cherry6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2025-02-28vs MParker-YMCASplit 11
W#1 DoublesDonna Heider / Marti Jenkins vs Barbara Gillespie / Maya Ress6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJean Haas / Elaine Yeh vs Jennifer Kuzma / Angela Baxley7-6, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Marti Jenkins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Jean Haas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.33
Judy Thomson
published
3.30
Elaine Yeh
published
3.19
Patty Hubbard
published
3.16
Donna Heider
published
3.12
Dawn Kleinman
published 3
3.08
Cora Darrah
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.01
Lisa Saenz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Marti Jenkins
35W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.43
3.5
Jean Haas
39W–38L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
Judy Thomson
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Elaine Yeh
14W–13L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Patty Hubbard
9W–1L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Donna Heider
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
3
Dawn Kleinman
18W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.12
3.5
Cora Darrah
115W–125L career · 3 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.08
3
Lisa Saenz
19W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.01

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.