Teams

Pongsugree- TRI4FUN

2024 Loudoun Tri-Level 18 & Over Women · Loudoun Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-07-22vs LOUDOUN - ZimmermanSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCheryl Danner / Wendy Hopkins vs Jeanne Baily / Beth Kaufman1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesUrsula Cox / Lisa Furgal vs Jennifer Annessa / Julianne Nitta6-3, 4-4
2024-07-16vs Marcotte- Tri for the WinWon 10
W#1 DoublesJill Poretz / Cheryl Danner vs Josette Aevermann / Errin Matechak6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2024-07-09vs Schinner- Love Means NothingWon 10
W#3 DoublesLisa Furgal / Catherine Chang vs Elle Sullivant / Jennifer Rammes6-4, 6-4
2024-07-01vs Yarmosh-OkohWon 10
W#1 DoublesCheryl Danner / Jutta Nohra vs Alvi Aggarwal / Laurie Peacock6-3, 6-4
2024-06-04vs Schinner- Love Means NothingWon 10
W#3 DoublesSharon DiRenzo / Lisa Furgal vs Carolyn Mccarter / Julia Moss7-5, 4-5
2024-05-29vs Yarmosh-OkohLost 01
L#3 DoublesSharon DiRenzo / Catherine Chang vs Christy Bixler / Lynn Colavita3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.28
Erin Green
published
3.65
Paige Fishel
published
3.60
Jill Poretz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.40
Julie Kane
published
3.38
Cheryl Danner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Hannah Auyang
published
3.32
Tina Le
published
3.24
Lisa Furgal
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Megan Sultan
published
3.13
Ursula Cox
published
2.70
Sharon DiRenzo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jutta Nohra
published
Verna Flemming
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jill Poretz + Cheryl Danner4745% gamesnot enough data
Sharon DiRenzo + Lisa Furgal5067% gamesnot enough data
Julie Kane + Megan Sultan123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Erin Green
18W–16L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
4.28
Paige Fishel
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.65
4
Jill Poretz
305W–215L career · 4 lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.60
Julie Kane
14W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Cheryl Danner
137W–193L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.38
Hannah Auyang
11W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
Tina Le
16W–12L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%9%
3.32
3.5
Lisa Furgal
204W–131L career · 3 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
Megan Sultan
11W–11L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.17
Ursula Cox
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.13
3
Sharon DiRenzo
103W–140L career · 2 lines in 2024
8%90%1%
2.70
Jutta Nohra
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Verna Flemming
7W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.