Teams

Pierpont Racquettes

2025 USTA Adult 18 & Over - Ventura · Ventura - Women 3.0 WE

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-06-22vs V-LLW Sunset Aces - ValentinoLost 13
W#1 DoublesJenna Phillips / Erin Kraus vs JANE HUANG / Christina Yumul6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLucia Shanahan vs Jennifer Meckfessel6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKelley Knowlton / Charne Huff vs Dawn Stutzman / Callie Paranick4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesPatty Mallery / Jenny Ebert vs Nora Valentino / Heather Kawai6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 3.0 WE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Jenna Phillips
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Lucia Shanahan
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.04
Nicolette Villa
published
3.03
2.98
Jenny Ebert
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Erin Kraus
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Joeli Gutfleisch
published
2.74
Lauren Malan
published
2.71
Pati Jurewicz
published
2.68
Charne Huff
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.63
2.59
Anna Atwell
published 3
2.59
Saudamini Sindhar
published
Kelley Knowlton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Patty Mallery
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lucia Shanahan + Jenna Phillips5261% games+18.8% vs expected
Nicolette Villa + Lauren Malan2442% games+2.3% vs expected
Erin Kraus + Charne Huff1532% games−10.6% vs expected
Lauren Malan + Charne Huff224 matchesnot enough data
Pati Jurewicz + Charne Huff123 matchesnot enough data
Erin Kraus + Jenna Phillips303 matchesnot enough data
Anna Atwell + Lauren Malan033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jenna Phillips
14W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
1%84%15%
3.35
Lucia Shanahan
13W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Nicolette Villa
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.04
3
Diana Trinh-Salzer
29W–78L career · no lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.03
Jenny Ebert
7W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98
Erin Kraus
7W–28L career · 1 line in 2025
64%36%<1%
2.95
Joeli Gutfleisch
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
Lauren Malan
6W–15L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.74
Pati Jurewicz
11W–13L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.71
3
Charne Huff
4W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Linda Manguiat-Herzog
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
2.63
3
Anna Atwell
0W–10L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
2.59
Saudamini Sindhar
3W–9L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
2.59
Kelley Knowlton
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Patty Mallery
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.