Teams

RMcClenny

2022 Capital Combo 18 & Over · 8.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 4.42 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-10-09vs DFarmer 18+ 8.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesRichard McClenny / Donny Joyce vs Jeremy Alston / Brent Nieri6-3, 6-3
2022-10-05Won 10
W#2 DoublesRichard McClenny / Patrick Shields vs Trey Coomes / Christopher Lloyd6-3, 6-3
2022-09-25vs SLlewellyn 8.5 CAPWon 10
W#2 DoublesParker Sheridan / Blake Hutchinson vs Ryan Lewis / Spencer Llewellyn6-4, 7-5
2022-09-18vs SWingoWon 30
W#1 DoublesRichard McClenny / Patrick Shields vs Sean Heuser / Jason Frank6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesParker Sheridan / Joshua Collins vs Davis Felts / Vann Taylor6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesPatrick Newsome / Craig Schauman vs Nile Testerman / Barrett Rankin6-2, 6-4
2022-08-28vs RWalter 8.5 18+ RRCWon 10
W#3 DoublesRichard McClenny / Brandon Keisner vs Cameron Rutledge / Russell Riley6-0, 6-1
2022-08-14vs IGJimenezWon 20
W#2 DoublesParker Sheridan / Thomas Alligood vs Connor Funk / Gabe Jimenez7-6, 7-6
W#3 DoublesRichard McClenny / Patrick Shields vs Paul Weisner / Pete Vammino6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.20 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.64
Connor Wilkins
published 5
4.43
Parker Sheridan
usually #2 Doubles 78%, also #3 Doubles 11% · published 4.5
4.31
Richard Papantonis
published
4.25
Richard McClenny
usually #2 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 4.5
Blake Hutchinson
published 4.5
4.24
Patrick Newsome
published
4.21
Patrick Shields
published
4.20
Raymond Xu
published
3.94
Donny Joyce
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
Craig Schauman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Jason Abhau
published
Joshua Collins
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patrick Shields + Richard McClenny9359% games+1.8% vs expected
Patrick Newsome + Richard McClenny9157% games−1.9% vs expected
Craig Schauman + Richard McClenny3552% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Connor Wilkins
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
4.64
4.5
Parker Sheridan
202W–65L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
4.43
Richard Papantonis
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
Richard McClenny
432W–130L career · 11 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Blake Hutchinson
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Patrick Newsome
19W–7L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
4.24
Patrick Shields
43W–14L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
4.21
Raymond Xu
30W–23L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
4.20
4
Donny Joyce
64W–39L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%68%32%
3.94
4
Craig Schauman
163W–154L career · 1 line in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.61
Jason Abhau
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Joshua Collins
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.