Teams

Em.Best40A

2024 Capital Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-05-21vs Ka.Knoblauch40ALost 02
L#1 DoublesClaudia Cadet / Sarah Hill Waters vs Kelly Day / Mary Zimardo0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesBrandy Vannoy / Karen Bornhofen vs Nicole Masters / Emily Boyer2-6, 0-6
2024-05-13vs Ch.McCorquodale40AWon 20
W#1 DoublesClaudia Cadet / Abigail Douek vs Patty Wroblewski / Lusally Hong6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesEmily Best / Kristin Esham vs Christine Mccorquodale / Carol Rosser6-0, 7-6
2024-05-07Won 20
W#1 DoublesKristin Esham / Claudia Cadet vs Lis Thompson / Eden Jenkins6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesEmily Best / Abigail Douek vs Patricia Weston / Rebecca Bowen6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2024-04-30vs Ju.Shuey40AWon 20
W#1 DoublesAbigail Douek / Claudia Cadet vs Teri O'Neill / Julie Shuey6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKristin Esham / Jaime Gaskins vs Molly Clark / Rondi Furgason6-2, 7-5
2024-04-17vs Ch.McCorquodale40AWon 31
W#1 DoublesCaroline Braswell / Kristin Esham vs Mary Strothmann / Mary T Long6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCatie Cunningham vs Patty Wroblewski6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAmy Cantando / Meredith Piper vs Priscilla Nanney / Alise Fredrickson2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKaren Bornhofen / Brandy Vannoy vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-04-16vs Mar.Slaymaker40ALost 03
L#1 DoublesJaime Gaskins / Claudia Cadet vs Tara Spina / Keri Urwin0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAbigail Douek / Emily Best vs Marilyn Slaymaker / Emma Coblentz5-7, 6-0, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKaren Bornhofen / Brandy Vannoy vs Shayne Brodsgaard / Peggy Dobbins0-6, 4-6
2024-04-02vs Me.Ferrell40AWon 21
W#1 DoublesCaroline Braswell / Kristin Esham vs Janice Garside / Rebecca Bowen6-0, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCatie Cunningham vs Kelly Burkhardt6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesBrandy Vannoy / Meredith Piper vs Alisa Smith / Lis Thompson6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2024-03-19vs Ju.Shuey40ASplit 11
W#2 DoublesEmily Best / Abigail Douek vs Molly Clark / Pamela Pitre4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMeredith Piper / Karen Bornhofen vs Julie Shuey / Teri O'Neill3-6, 2-6
2024-03-12vs Ka.Knoblauch40ALost 13
L#1 DoublesCaroline Braswell / Claudia Cadet vs Mary Zimardo / Kelly Day1-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesKristin Esham vs Kathryn Shields3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAbigail Douek / Jaime Gaskins vs Kari Knoblauch / Liz Woodall2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJocelyn Shaw / Meredith Piper vs Zoe Whitesell / Courtney Grinnell2-6, 3-6
2024-03-08vs Mar.Slaymaker40ASplit 11
L#1 DoublesClaudia Cadet / Abigail Douek vs Tara Spina / Emma Coblentz4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCaroline Braswell / Kristin Esham vs Cathy Werder / Kimberlei Gill2-6, 6-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Abigail Douek
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3
3.03
Catie Cunningham
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
2.99
Kristin Esham
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.89
Amy Cantando
published 3
2.82
Emily Best
published 3
2.80
2.79
Jocelyn Shaw
published
2.74
Karen Bornhofen
published
2.70
Meredith Piper
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.66
Claudia Cadet
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.52
Jaime Gaskins
published 3
2.27
Brandy Vannoy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Claudia Cadet + Catie Cunningham4168% gamesnot enough data
Kristin Esham + Catie Cunningham303 matchesnot enough data
Kristin Esham + Abigail Douek213 matchesnot enough data
Claudia Cadet + Abigail Douek213 matchesnot enough data
Amy Cantando + Karen Bornhofen213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Abigail Douek
82W–38L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%12%88%
3.15
3.5
Catie Cunningham
98W–63L career · type A · 2 lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
3.03
3
Kristin Esham
89W–69L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
2.99
3
Amy Cantando
6W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Emily Best
10W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Caroline Braswell
7W–0L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
2.80
Jocelyn Shaw
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%5%
2.79
Karen Bornhofen
11W–7L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Meredith Piper
29W–37L career · 4 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Claudia Cadet
38W–39L career · 7 lines in 2024
10%89%<1%
2.66
3
Jaime Gaskins
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
44%55%<1%
2.52
2.5
Brandy Vannoy
21W–29L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%96%4%
2.27

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.