Teams

WI Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women FCRC Backus

2026 WI Adult 55 & Over · WI Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#3 DoublesCharmaine Foley / Kathy Strickler vs Kerry Destino / Ann Neerdaels6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKathy Strickler / Debora Will-jochman vs Sue Roberts / Anne Avond4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesShirley Connor / Kathy Backus vs Heather Strayer / Theresa Palasota1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 DoublesShirley Connor / Jilane Brooks vs Amy Vanharpen / Debbie Ruplinger4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKathy Backus / Debora Will-jochman vs Imee Hofmeister / Darlene Kramer3-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesPam Weider / Jilane Brooks vs Anne Czyz Klemens / Michelle Mileski6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDiane Ziegler / Mary Miller vs Sheila Butrym / Kelly van Scoyk4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDebora Will-jochman / Kathy Strickler vs Jean Bachmann / Diane Troutman2-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesJilane Brooks / Pam Weider vs Julie Kowalkowski / Karrie Kowalkowski6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesShirley Connor / Charmaine Foley vs Renee Wills / Janis Graupman6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKathy Backus / Susan Schmidt vs Bonnie Goelz / Cheryl Thompson6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesDiane Ziegler / Jilane Brooks vs Kathy Kelly / Heather Strayer3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesShirley Connor / Debora Will-jochman vs Maureen Burke / Tracy Mitchell2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKathy Strickler / Mary Miller vs Melita Parker / Jane Smith1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · WI Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WI Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women FCRC VanHarpen511536111
2WI Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women GBTC Smith4213513132
3WI Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women Western Williams3371125174
4WI Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women FCRC Backus236922152
5WI Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women Western Anderson0511429176

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Charmaine Foley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.15
Diane Ziegler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.09
Shirley Connor
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Kathy Backus
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kathy Strickler
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Kristie Neher
published
Linda Vanwyk
published
Pam Weider
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristie Neher + Pam Weider314 matchesnot enough data
Shirley Connor + Kristie Neher033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Charmaine Foley
2W–0L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Diane Ziegler
15W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
3.15
Shirley Connor
21W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.09
Kathy Backus
6W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kathy Strickler
3W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kristie Neher
5W–10L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Linda Vanwyk
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Pam Weider
8W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.