Teams

Fitzgerald Men/FR

2022 TUL TRI-LEVEL 18 & Over League · MEN 3.5

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-09-03vs Webster/LFLost 02
L#2 DoublesJoseph Odon / Roger Thomas vs Lindsay Smith / Thomas Arens4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSean Burns / Derek Orr vs Chuy Socarro / Chris Ashman7-5, 1-6, 0-1
2022-08-25vs Jones/TTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesGrant Hinkle / Maxwell Fitzgerald vs Richard Dericks / Thomas Powers3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTae Kim / Roger Thomas vs Christopher Bird / Jordan Taylor3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSean Burns / Josh Hinkle vs Joseph Parker / Paul Warren7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2022-08-15vs Tulsa: Thompson/PHLost 02
L#2 DoublesJoseph Odon / Tae Kim vs Larry Thompson / Scott Hjelm0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSean Burns / Derek Orr vs Jay Penn / David Wallis3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-08-04vs Wood/PHLost 12
L#1 DoublesPat Fitzgerald / Grant Hinkle vs Conner Wood / Hunter Henry4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJoseph Odon / Tae Kim vs Luke Humphrey / Walter van Hanken4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesSean Burns / Derek Orr vs Maxwell Remy / David Oraee6-1, 6-4
2022-07-28vs Stevenson/LFLost 03
L#1 DoublesMickey Replogle / Sean Burns vs Jim Vanderveen / Ky Nichols5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRoger Thomas / Tae Kim vs David Flores / Christopher Beard3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMaxwell Fitzgerald / Grant Hinkle vs Hieu Pham / Ramnath Ranganathan3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · MEN 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Tulsa: Thompson/PH6014413138
2Webster/LF5113514127
3Sanders/LF12451188
4Stevenson/LF136614112
5Wood/PH1451023165
6Fitzgerald Men/FR1431226176

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Grant Hinkle
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.86
Joseph Odon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Tae Kim
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Derek Orr
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Josh Hinkle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mickey Replogle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sean Burns
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sean Burns + Mickey Replogle4552% games−2.2% vs expected
Josh Hinkle + Derek Orr3841% games−11.0% vs expected
Sean Burns + Derek Orr224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Grant Hinkle
5W–2L career · type S · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Joseph Odon
56W–35L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.86
Tae Kim
21W–64L career · 4 lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
3.48
3.5
Derek Orr
8W–15L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Josh Hinkle
51W–50L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%24%76%
3.09
Mickey Replogle
40W–21L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Sean Burns
11W–27L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.