Teams

SCC Lineberger

2024 Richmond Combo Weekend · Richmond Combo Weekend 8.5 Men

13 players · average NTRP 4.11 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-09-15vs Woodlake PattersonLost 01
L#3 DoublesStuart Fulcher / Richard Lloyd vs Tanner Allison / Michael Cabral6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-09-07vs MAC SnowLost 02
L#2 DoublesTommy Bader / Richard Lloyd vs Michael Montgomery / Eric Spivack6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesStuart Fulcher / Mark Holland vs Dylan Brod / Allen Huang6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-08-27vs Belmont Bond 007Lost 01
L#2 DoublesTommy Bader / Charles Means vs Naveen Chennupati / Richard Sherman6-7, 2-6
2024-08-24vs Burkwood ButterworthLost 02
L#1 DoublesStuart Fulcher / Mark Holland vs Ethan Belote / Jason DeHaven1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTommy Bader / Russ Haskin vs Richard Clark / Kyle Russell3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-08-04vs 8.5 Captain Morgan's Stand at MACWon 10
W#2 DoublesTommy Bader / Charles Means vs Jeff Richman / Warren Smigo6-2, 6-4
2024-07-27vs WW Ninjas - BakerLost 01
L#3 DoublesStuart Fulcher / Charles Means vs Ryan Harris / Michael Baxter2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Weekend 8.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Drew Lineberger
published 4.5
4.16
Geoff Usher
published 4.5
4.14
Stuart Fulcher
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.92
Jay Nelson
published
3.85
Tommy Bader
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.85
3.83
David Voth
published 4
3.83
Richard Lloyd
published
3.76
Charles Means
published 4
3.74
J Lafors
published 4
3.64
Mark Holland
published
3.40
Christopher Doern
published 3.5
Scott Broaddus
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stuart Fulcher + Tommy Bader7749% gamesnot enough data
Christopher Corts + Tommy Bader3452% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Drew Lineberger
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Geoff Usher
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%<1%
4.16
4.5
Stuart Fulcher
149W–170L career · 4 lines in 2024
14%86%<1%
4.14
Jay Nelson
14W–18L career · no lines in 2024
73%27%<1%
3.92
4
Tommy Bader
115W–144L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Christopher Corts
46W–45L career · no lines in 2024
<1%87%12%
3.85
4
David Voth
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.83
Richard Lloyd
7W–9L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Charles Means
6W–14L career · no lines in 2024
2%95%3%
3.76
4
J Lafors
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.74
Mark Holland
8W–4L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%<1%
3.64
3.5
Christopher Doern
8W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.40
Scott Broaddus
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.