Teams

garrity-natchez

2026 Adult 55 & Over-SW · Men 3.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-04-12vs BrookhavenWon 30
W#1 DoublesJim Ferguson / Joe Garrity vs Greg Ryan / Chad Oberschmidt8-5
W#2 DoublesDick Whitaker / Eli Whitaker vs Mark Giust / Sam Oldham8-4
W#3 DoublesDanny Huffines / Curren Pitre vs Patrick Brown / William Hill8-5
2026-04-12vs BrookhavenWon 30
W#1 DoublesJim Ferguson / Dick Whitaker vs Greg Ryan / Sam Oldham8-0
W#2 DoublesJoe Garrity / Eli Whitaker vs Chad Oberschmidt / Mark Giust8-5
W#3 DoublesCurren Pitre / Danny Huffines vs Patrick Brown / William Hill8-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · Men 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1garrity-natchez2060025

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Dick Whitaker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.39
Danny Huffines
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Rodney Terral
published
3.36
Michael Schilling
published
Eli Whitaker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Curren Pitre
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Joe Garrity
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Jim Ferguson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joe Garrity + Jim Ferguson303 matchesnot enough data
Michael Schilling + Curren Pitre213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dick Whitaker
12W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Danny Huffines
10W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
3.39
Rodney Terral
53W–40L career · no lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
Michael Schilling
18W–15L career · no lines in 2026
<1%86%13%
3.36
3.5
Eli Whitaker
5W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Curren Pitre
11W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
Joe Garrity
9W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
Jim Ferguson
5W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.