Teams

Huguenot - Stone

2021 Duval Adult 18 & Over - Women · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.58 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-06-26vs Glen Kernan - KozackSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLois Robichaud / Jamie Wienckowski vs Christi Bisson / Susan Day7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCindy Kling / Rebecca Smith vs Lara Leinenweber / Maria Sarmiento6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2021-06-12vs Hidden Hills - BuccaWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Yackee / Jamie Wienckowski vs Olivia Markham / Vandi Cole7-6, 6-1
2021-05-29vs Baymeadows - JohnsonLost 01
L#1 DoublesJamie Wienckowski / Carol Kelley vs Maria Lourdes Salvador / Kimberly Rogers4-6, 2-6
2021-05-22vs Duval - Julington Creek - BeyerLost 01
L#1 DoublesCarol Kelley / Jamie Wienckowski vs Natalie Beyer / Megan Hendricks2-6, 4-6
2021-05-15vs Williams Y - TiefenthalerLost 01
L#3 DoublesRebecca Smith / Anne DeWeese vs Jenni Westbrook / Siri Jansen1-6, 5-7
2021-05-08vs Glen Kernan - KozackWon 20
W#2 SinglesJamie Wienckowski vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRebecca Smith / Anne DeWeese vs Connie Rouls / Diana Gardner7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Jamie Wienckowski
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4
3.44
Aura Bernal
published 3.5
3.38
Carol Kelley
published 3.5
3.33
Diane Stone
published 3.5
3.22
Tammy Oswald
published
3.21
Lois Robichaud
published
3.15
Anne DeWeese
published 3.5
3.12
Cherie Johnson
published 3.5
3.04
Judith Daniel
published
Rebecca Smith
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aura Bernal + Diane Stone4158% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jamie Wienckowski
27W–20L career · 5 lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.71
3.5
Aura Bernal
23W–14L career · no lines in 2021
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Carol Kelley
24W–21L career · no lines in 2021
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Diane Stone
24W–20L career · no lines in 2021
1%90%10%
3.33
Tammy Oswald
18W–19L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%2%
3.22
Lois Robichaud
8W–13L career · no lines in 2021
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Anne DeWeese
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Cherie Johnson
8W–17L career · no lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
3.12
Judith Daniel
5W–3L career · no lines in 2021
39%61%<1%
3.04
Rebecca Smith
26W–36L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.