← Teams

SHC-Macdonald/Schipporeit

2020 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women

2 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Tami Socolofsky
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
—
Katherine Farrell
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2019-10-26Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesSheri Schipporeit / Katherine Farrell vs Cheryl Hansen / Mary Head6-3, 6-4
2019-10-20Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesTami Socolofsky / Susan Judge vs Patricia Sturr / Pauline Reilly6-4, 6-0
2019-10-12Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesChristine Keefer / Tami Socolofsky vs Trylla Lembke / Lanetta Ward6-1, 6-2
2019-10-05Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesKatherine Farrell / Linda Clayton vs Karen Richardson / Julie Mathews2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2019-09-28Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesTami Socolofsky / Linda Clayton vs Itsuko Day / Kris Parmele7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKatherine Farrell / Sheri Schipporeit vs Gretchen Newcomb / Nozomi Bray6-4, 6-3
2019-09-22Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesSusan Judge / Tami Socolofsky vs Julia Hall / Rico McIver6-1, 6-4
2019-09-14Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesKatherine Farrell / Sheri Schipporeit vs Susie Garland / Shirley Layton6-1, 6-2
2019-09-08Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesDenise Angel / Katherine Farrell vs Angela Addington / Pat Kaplan6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Tami Socolofsky
31W–36L career
2%92%6%
3.32
3.5
Katherine Farrell
43W–32L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.