Teams

Healy/Arkadelphia/Reb

2024 Adult 65 & Over · 4.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.67 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-09-29vs LaGrossa/Greenbriar/RebLost 12
W#1 DoublesMary Harrison / Carol Jones vs Jan Tipton / Trudy Pascale7-5, 7-6
L#2 DoublesJudy Wiley / Cindy Alexander vs Camille LaGrossa / Carey Freeman4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDee Healy / Carol Ketchum vs Sip Mouden / Maria Rocha2-6, 1-6
2024-09-28vs LaGrossa/Greenbriar/RebLost 12
W#1 DoublesDee Healy / Carol Ketchum vs Trudy Pascale / Sip Mouden6-0, 7-6
L#2 DoublesCarol Jones / Rebecca Reed vs Debbie Cooper / Deborah Benson5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJoy Wolf / Melinda Hood vs Linda Bahan / Camille LaGrossa4-6, 3-6
2024-09-28vs Jeter/Fayetteville/RebLost 12
L#1 DoublesDee Healy / Rebecca Reed vs Sandy Jones / Margie Moss5-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesCarol Ketchum / Joy Wolf vs Susan Akins / Anne Schrader4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesCarol Jones / Mary Harrison vs Mary McCain / Brenda Jeter7-5, 0-6, 1-0
2024-09-28vs Jeter/Fayetteville/RebLost 12
W#1 DoublesDee Healy / Carol Ketchum vs Brenda Jeter / Crystal Noble6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMary Harrison / Carol Jones vs Sandy Jones / Margie Moss0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJoy Wolf / Cindy Alexander vs Mary McCain / Susan Akins1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Carol Jones
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.51
Dee Healy
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.49
Carol Ketchum
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.35
Rebecca Reed
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.32
Joy Wolf
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.31
Judy Wiley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Karen Demott
published
Melinda Hood
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carol Ketchum + Dee Healy10656% games−4.4% vs expected
Carol Ketchum + Judy Wiley303 matchesnot enough data
Carol Jones + Rebecca Reed033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carol Jones
15W–17L career · 4 lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.65
3.5
Dee Healy
17W–11L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%46%54%
3.51
3.5
Carol Ketchum
14W–9L career · type A · 4 lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
3.49
Rebecca Reed
8W–17L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.35
Joy Wolf
6W–6L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
Judy Wiley
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
Karen Demott
5W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Melinda Hood
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.