Teams

Stone

2026 Hampton Roads Adult 55 & Over Spring · Hampton Roads Adult 55 & Over Spring 9.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 4.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-06vs Nissman - Wild Tennis Women 2026!Lost 01
L#1 DoublesShelley O'Malley / Christopher Witherspoon vs Deborah Brewster / Michelle Woodruff2-6, 3-6
2026-05-30vs Nissman - Wild Tennis Women 2026!Won 20
W#1 DoublesRebecca Jucksch / Laura Stone vs Kathy Courage / Shelley Smith6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSusan Willard / Christopher Witherspoon vs Molly Nissman / Carina Simpson6-3, 7-6
2026-05-16vs Nissman - Wild Tennis Women 2026!Won 20
W#1 DoublesBarbara Rose / Laurie Marshall vs Kathy Courage / Carina Simpson6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLaura Stone / Shelley O'Malley vs Molly Nissman / Stacey Shiflet6-2, 6-2
2026-05-09vs Nissman - Wild Tennis Women 2026!Won 30
W#1 DoublesRebecca Jucksch / Christopher Witherspoon vs Molly Nissman / Stacey Shiflet6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBarbara Rose / Laura Stone vs Becky Oatts / Shelley Smith6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLaurie Marshall / Liz Tuck vs Deborah Brewster / Carina Simpson6-4, 6-4
2026-04-25vs Nissman - Wild Tennis Women 2026!Won 20
W#2 DoublesRebecca Jucksch / Christopher Witherspoon vs Carina Simpson / Becky Oatts6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLiz Tuck / Susan Willard vs Molly Nissman / Kathy Courage6-4, 6-1
2026-04-11vs Nissman - Wild Tennis Women 2026!Won 30
W#1 DoublesChristopher Witherspoon / Rebecca Jucksch vs Deborah Brewster / Molly Nissman6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBarbara Rose / Liz Tuck vs Kathy Courage / Shelley Smith6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCatherine White / Shelley O'Malley vs Carina Simpson / Stacey Shiflet6-0, 6-0
2026-03-07vs Nissman - Wild Tennis Women 2026!Won 20
W#2 DoublesShelley O'Malley / Susan Willard vs Carina Simpson / Shelley Smith6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLaurie Marshall / Rebecca Jucksch vs Kathy Courage / Stacey Shiflet6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Hampton Roads Adult 55 & Over Spring 9.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Stone611837104
2Nissman - Wild Tennis Women 2026!1631836220

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.24 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Barbara Rose
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.36
Susan Willard
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.35
Rebecca Jucksch
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
4.25
Shelley O'Malley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.13
Liz Tuck
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.00
Laurie Marshall
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Barbara Rose
5W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
4.36
Susan Willard
7W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
4.36
Rebecca Jucksch
8W–1L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
4.35
Shelley O'Malley
7W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
4.25
Liz Tuck
3W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
4.13
Laurie Marshall
3W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
4.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.