Teams

SGV Nic Stansbury-Scholl cyn/SU4

2025 Adult Division - 18 & Over San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Men 4.5

21 players · average NTRP 4.40 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
L#1 DoublesTosten Burks / Eric Hernandez vs Arthur Chen / Arman Davtyan0-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesNicolas Stansbury vs Joshua Chou6-2, 7-5
L#2 SinglesJudson Lim vs David Castillo4-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesEVAN CHANG / Eric Hernandez vs Hirsch Matani / Arman Davtyan4-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesGreg Howard / EVAN CHANG vs Bill Petrocelli / Cuong Minh Tran1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJudson Lim / EVAN CHANG vs Bill Petrocelli / Rand Lee4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesMichael Tschebaum / TEVIN JENKINS vs Eric Kao / Erik Martinez1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAnurag Anand / TEVIN JENKINS vs Alan Han / Sebastian Koh3-6, 5-7
L#1 DoublesNicolas Stansbury / Axel Cramer vs Paul Vincent Salvador / Chad Rodriguez6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKaelan Hicks vs Peter Gopaoco3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAlex Nassif / Jermaine Montgomery vs Hirsch Matani / Tyler Perez5-7, 6-7
L#2 SinglesJerik Centeno vs Erik Martinez3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Men 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.94 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Gabriel Yassky
published
Alex Nassif
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Axel Cramer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.19
Nicolas Stansbury
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.14
TEVIN JENKINS
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.07
Kaelan Hicks
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.01
Jerik Centeno
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.94
EVAN CHANG
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.91
Michael Pang
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.91
Michael Tschebaum
published
3.88
Ky Vo
published
3.70
Eric Sandoval
published
3.66
Keith Vazquez
published
3.64
Anurag Anand
published 4
Eric Hernandez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Greg Howard
published
Jermaine Montgomery
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jon San
published
Judson Lim
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Kyle McCain
published
Tosten Burks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Tschebaum + Alex Nassif213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Gabriel Yassky
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
4.29
4.5
Alex Nassif
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Axel Cramer
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Nicolas Stansbury
8W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%9%91%
4.19
4.5
TEVIN JENKINS
105W–50L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
4.14
Kaelan Hicks
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
31%69%<1%
4.07
Jerik Centeno
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%47%53%
4.01
4.5
EVAN CHANG
97W–139L career · 3 lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
3.94
Michael Pang
20W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.91
Michael Tschebaum
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.91
Ky Vo
11W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.88
Eric Sandoval
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.70
Keith Vazquez
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.66
4
Anurag Anand
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.64
Eric Hernandez
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Greg Howard
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jermaine Montgomery
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jon San
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Judson Lim
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kyle McCain
3W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tosten Burks
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.