Teams

DTC RED

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.29 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-21vs DTP GREENWon 31
W#1 DoublesMaura Spangler / Jann Peterson vs Elizabeth Phillips / Lynn Pearson6-2, 7-5
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Sipes vs Carrie Lee1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesSharon Kelly / Karen Polzin vs Ann Shiveley / Claudia Pillow6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKathy Graveley / Rebecca Wulliman vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-07-19vs WP GREENWon 31
W#1 DoublesMaura Spangler / Elizabeth Sipes vs Lauren Eddy / Esther Song7-6, 6-4
L#1 SinglesValeria Alberola vs Hadley Watson6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJody Hunnicutt / Karen Polzin vs Angelique Manley / Kristen Hanson6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSharon Kelly / Deborah Yoder vs Geetha Sivanandam / Ginger Merry6-4, 6-4
2022-07-17vs EM REDLost 12
W#1 DoublesJody Hunnicutt / Karen Polzin vs Michele Olree / Melissa Zink6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKathy Graveley / Deborah Yoder vs Ashley Wolfe / Kathryn Terry2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesValeria Alberola / Susan Nakano vs Corey Craig / Kate Bangs1-6, 1-6
2022-06-30vs DCC REDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesKaren Polzin / Jody Hunnicutt vs Dory Pratt / Robyn Larkin7-6, 6-4
L#1 SinglesValeria Alberola vs Claudia Garza1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJann Peterson / Elizabeth Sipes vs Heather Benes / Gina Carbone Fenton5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKathy Graveley / Rebecca Wulliman vs Kate Lively / Tia Wolkov6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2022-06-23vs GTC GREENSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMaura Spangler / Jann Peterson vs Minou Cramer / Brooke O'Drobinak6-3, 7-6
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Sipes vs Linda Thurman0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJody Hunnicutt / Sharon Kelly vs Sanda McMillan / Kimberly Allen7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesRebecca Wulliman / Kathy Graveley vs Bethany Sheldon / Suzette Emerson0-6, 2-6
2022-06-16vs WP BLUESplit 22
W#1 DoublesMaura Spangler / Elizabeth Sipes vs Claire Uman / Barbara Deboer6-4, 7-5
L#1 SinglesValeria Alberola vs Serena Sampat3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSusan Nakano / Jann Peterson vs Migdalia Morillo Rettig / Nichol Weizenbeck4-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRebecca Wulliman / Kathy Graveley vs Mary Salsich / Nancy Dilatush6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2022-06-09vs CACM BLACKLost 13
L#1 DoublesKaren Polzin / Sharon Kelly vs Monique Wehrle / Emily Pruisner1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesValeria Alberola vs Tamra Nathan3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJody Hunnicutt / Deborah Yoder vs Kelly Fitz / BethAnn Parsons0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSusan Nakano / Maura Spangler vs Christina Heitman / Leslie Rich6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Maura Spangler
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.37
Jody Hunnicutt
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.36
Sharon Kelly
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.23
Rebecca Wulliman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Jann Peterson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.00
Susan Nakano
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.89
Deborah Yoder
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.88
Elizabeth Sipes
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
Kathy Graveley
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Karen Polzin
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Valeria Alberola
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Polzin + Sharon Kelly7359% games+6.9% vs expected
Maura Spangler + Rebecca Wulliman7459% games+4.8% vs expected
Jody Hunnicutt + Sharon Kelly7359% games+4.6% vs expected
Maura Spangler + Jann Peterson6259% games+3.5% vs expected
Jody Hunnicutt + Karen Polzin12556% games+1.3% vs expected
Jody Hunnicutt + Jann Peterson171058% games+1.2% vs expected
Susan Nakano + Jann Peterson5356% games+0.9% vs expected
Susan Nakano + Deborah Yoder3250% games+0.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Maura Spangler
49W–26L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Jody Hunnicutt
109W–80L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
3.37
Sharon Kelly
37W–28L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
3.36
Rebecca Wulliman
34W–41L career · 3 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Jann Peterson
51W–47L career · 4 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Susan Nakano
57W–68L career · 3 lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.00
3
Deborah Yoder
37W–58L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Elizabeth Sipes
22W–32L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Kathy Graveley
38W–32L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Karen Polzin
33W–19L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Valeria Alberola
2W–14L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.