Teams

Aggerholm

2026 One Doubles · 5.0 Women

2 players · average NTRP 5.00 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-06-29vs TBDWon 10
W#1 DoublesKari Aggerholm / Jodie Wise vs Lora Edens / Melisa Biscayno7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2026-06-24vs NWW-HydeLost 01
L#1 DoublesJodie Wise / Kari Aggerholm vs Anna Qiu / Divya Manohar1-6, 5-7
2026-06-23vs CP - BethJoKatEugWon 10
W#1 DoublesKari Aggerholm / Jodie Wise vs Eugenia Salvo / Kathryn Osborne7-5, 6-3
2026-06-19vs CPCRUSHERSLost 01
L#1 DoublesKari Aggerholm / Jodie Wise vs Susie Heimdahl / Blakeley Bean3-6, 5-7
2026-06-18vs Belize FlashLost 01
L#1 DoublesKari Aggerholm / Jodie Wise vs Rochelle Whelan / Christine Hayes3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.63 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.72
Jodie Wise
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.54
Kari Aggerholm
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jodie Wise + Kari Aggerholm162049% games+0.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Jodie Wise
35W–37L career · 5 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.72
5
Kari Aggerholm
55W–49L career · 5 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.54

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.