Teams

San Jose - Katsikas

2022 Duval Trilevel Women · 3.0

20 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_2

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Natasha Eliz
published
3.50
Julie Boone
published
3.47
Jen Frenzel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.47
Jessica Hedrick
published
3.46
Nancy Hennessy
published
3.42
Dawn Siebenhaar
published 3.5
3.26
Michelle Kalil
published
3.26
Amanda Blocker
published 3.5
3.19
Ambur Finley
published 3.5
3.18
Karla Liguori
published
3.17
Anna Valent
published 3.5
3.17
Allison Wise
published 3.5
3.12
Emily Dostie
published 3.5
2.87
Margaret Samuels
published
2.83
Laurie Kirchhoff
published
2.81
Phyllis Crabtree
published
Kathleen Lebet
published
Kristi Kuzon
published
Maria Rose Cauchon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allison Wise + Nancy Hennessy224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Natasha Eliz
10W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%40%60%
3.53
Julie Boone
5W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%52%48%
3.50
Jen Frenzel
57W–44L career · 4 lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
3.47
Jessica Hedrick
16W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%60%40%
3.47
Nancy Hennessy
14W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Dawn Siebenhaar
11W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
3.42
Michelle Kalil
11W–9L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Amanda Blocker
11W–7L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Allison Korman Shelton
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Ambur Finley
7W–13L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Karla Liguori
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%8%92%
3.18
3.5
Anna Valent
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Allison Wise
11W–19L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Emily Dostie
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.12
Margaret Samuels
13W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
2.87
Laurie Kirchhoff
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
2.83
Phyllis Crabtree
18W–21L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
Kathleen Lebet
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kristi Kuzon
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Maria Rose Cauchon
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.