Teams

CM GREEN

2026 USTA MIXED 40 & OVER - DEN · MIXED 7.0 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.44 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-05vs WP ORANGEWon 21
L#1 DoublesMegan Fredricks / Christopher Hailes vs Vishwa Seneviratne / AUSRA MOLLERUD7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKelly Fitz / Pete Fredricks vs Neda Rasouli / Bruce Silver6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLea VanSchaack / Taylor Weir vs Sharon Alton / Kipp Kramer6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2026-07-01vs CACM NAVYWon 30
W#1 DoublesTaylor Weir / Romi Hovey vs Dustin du Pont / Jena Dupont6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesChris Chang / Megan Fredricks vs Harold Kiefer / Courtney Kiefer7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMary Vivo / Pete Fredricks vs MacAyla Hansen / Jay Logan6-2, 6-2
2026-06-28vs GTC YELLOWLost 12
L#1 DoublesLea VanSchaack / Taylor Weir vs Erica Bissette / Louis Bissette3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMegan Fredricks / Chris Chang vs Daniel Yamagishi / Valerie Imperial6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesPete Fredricks / Mary Vivo vs Matthew Gallagher / Kelly Nordini3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-06-14vs DTC REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesMegan Fredricks / Chris Chang vs Barbara Askenazi / Simon Levy6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLea VanSchaack / Christopher Hailes vs Paul Suter / Cherlyn Linden6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesRomi Hovey / David Goetz vs James Sutton / Alexis Sutton1-6, 4-6
2026-06-07vs WP GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesTaylor Weir / Romi Hovey vs Jarrid DeMaio / Serena Sampat6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLea VanSchaack / Christopher Hailes vs Kristin Loudis / Greg Allen7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMary Vivo / Pete Fredricks vs Tia Wolkov / Jeffrey Merman6-2, 6-1
2026-05-31vs CACM GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesTaylor Weir / Kelly Fitz vs Charles Greenhouse / Nancy Harlow-Irwin6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesRomi Hovey / Justin Franks vs Sheryl Chandler / Paul Chandler6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMary Vivo / David Goetz vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-05-24vs CP REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesRomi Hovey / Christopher Hailes vs Paul Henkelmann / Reba Tsvetkova5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTaylor Weir / Megan Fredricks vs Tally Lawing / Suzette Emerson4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesPete Fredricks / Mary Vivo vs Casper Lundemann / Sanda McMillan6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 7.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Christopher Hailes
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.59
Chris Chang
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.57
Kelly Fitz
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.50
Mary Vivo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.30
Taylor Weir
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.23
Justin Franks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Lea VanSchaack
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.23
Romi Hovey
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.22
Megan Fredricks
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.08
Pete Fredricks
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.95
David Goetz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Megan Fredricks + Pete Fredricks13466% games+11.1% vs expected
Taylor Weir + Romi Hovey4159% games+10.4% vs expected
Chris Chang + Megan Fredricks5258% games+6.0% vs expected
Taylor Weir + Mary Vivo91847% games+1.0% vs expected
Lea VanSchaack + Taylor Weir134 matchesnot enough data
Pete Fredricks + Mary Vivo314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Christopher Hailes
113W–57L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%22%78%
3.60
3.5
Chris Chang
69W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%25%75%
3.59
3.5
Kelly Fitz
201W–71L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%29%71%
3.57
4
Mary Vivo
67W–65L career · type A · 5 lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
3.50
Taylor Weir
39W–49L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
Justin Franks
7W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Lea VanSchaack
56W–85L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
Romi Hovey
63W–51L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Megan Fredricks
56W–25L career · type A · 5 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.22
3
Pete Fredricks
66W–30L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%28%72%
3.08
3
David Goetz
83W–74L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
2.95

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.