Teams

DGarretson/Healy/LR/BP

2022 Combo 55 & Over · 7.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.42 / ARKANSAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Carol Harris
published 3.5
3.55
Carol Ketchum
published 3.5
3.44
Deanna Garretson
published 3.5
3.42
Dee Healy
published 3.5
3.21
Natalie Griffin
published
3.04
Caroline Fox
published 3.5
2.78
Cindy Kolb
published 3
Karen Demott
published
Lonna Hansen
published
Rhea Ruggles
published
Shelley Noonan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carol Ketchum + Dee Healy15855% games−4.8% vs expected
Carol Ketchum + Karen Demott314 matchesnot enough data
Dee Healy + Karen Demott314 matchesnot enough data
Carol Ketchum + Rhea Ruggles123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carol Harris
14W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%5%95%
3.72
3.5
Carol Ketchum
35W–14L career · type A · no lines in 2022
<1%36%64%
3.55
3.5
Deanna Garretson
33W–48L career · no lines in 2022
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Dee Healy
23W–20L career · no lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.42
Natalie Griffin
23W–18L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Caroline Fox
5W–9L career · no lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.04
3
Cindy Kolb
7W–15L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
2.78
Karen Demott
11W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lonna Hansen
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rhea Ruggles
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Shelley Noonan
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.