Teams

Ka.Serow55C5.5

2023 Cap Combo 55 & Over · 5.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.93 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-10-09vs Ly.Longest55CWon 10
W#1 DoublesPam Tousseau / Karen Blume vs Cosette Philpot / Sally Sikes6-4, 7-5
2023-09-25Won 20
W#1 DoublesKaren Wahle / Carol Rosser vs Lori Harrelson / Lesa Edwards6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKathleen Serow / Julendia Gaillard vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-09-18vs Ly.Longest55CSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKathleen Serow / Julendia Gaillard vs Theresa Perlowski / Vanessa Fleischmann1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPam Tousseau / Christine Brandt vs Cosette Philpot / Maria Riemann6-4, 6-3
2023-09-16vs Ro.Ziperski55CLost 02
L#1 DoublesCarol Rosser / Karen Blume vs Robyn Ziperski / Lori Harrelson3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesPam Tousseau / Christine Brandt vs DEBRA LAUGHERY / Chris Lickey2-6, 1-6
2023-09-11vs We.Sielaty55CWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarol Rosser / Karen Blume vs Jennifer Diehl / Julie Shuey6-3, 6-2
2023-08-21vs Ly.Longest55CLost 02
L#1 DoublesAnn Walters / Karen Blume vs Mary Strothmann / Kathryn Williamson1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJulendia Gaillard / Pam Tousseau vs Lynn Longest / Lavonne Moore1-6, 4-6
2023-08-14vs We.Sielaty55CLost 02
L#1 DoublesKathleen Serow / Julendia Gaillard vs Teri O'Neill / Jennifer Diehl1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCarol Rosser / Lacey Seaton vs Jade Paunovich / Kimberly Ruzzier3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-08-07vs Ro.Ziperski55CLost 01
L#1 DoublesPam Tousseau / Julendia Gaillard vs Lesa Edwards / Jeanne Stallings2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.55 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.88
Karen Blume
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
Kathleen Serow
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
Ann Walters
published 3
2.71
Gwen Coyte
published 3
2.60
Carol Rosser
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.41
Martha Lempicke
published
2.39
Pam Tousseau
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.00
Christine Brandt
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Blume + Carol Rosser314 matchesnot enough data
Carol Rosser + Kathleen Serow213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Karen Blume
44W–38L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
2.88
3
Kathleen Serow
132W–119L career · 7 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Ann Walters
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Gwen Coyte
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
2.71
3
Carol Rosser
45W–76L career · 4 lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
2.60
Martha Lempicke
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
75%25%<1%
2.41
3
Pam Tousseau
21W–40L career · 5 lines in 2023
79%21%<1%
2.39
2.5
Christine Brandt
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.