← Teams

SHC-DeMoss

2022 Adult 65 & Over · 8.0 Men

5 players · average NTRP 3.7 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Alan Kaplan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.47
Tom Lonergan
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.46
Bill Rhoades
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.38
Russ DeMoss
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Michael Lavios
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Results5 ties
2022-05-12Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesAlan Kaplan / Michael Lavios vs Rod MacMillan / Peter Mersereau6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRuss DeMoss / Bill Rhoades vs Jack Henry / John Popplewell6-1, 6-2
2022-04-28Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesRuss DeMoss / Michael Lavios vs Ted Carlson / Henry Bryant6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBill Rhoades / Tom Lonergan vs Jack Schunk / Bob Bedritis6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2022-04-21Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesRuss DeMoss / Michael Lavios vs Bill Henderson / Peter Mersereau6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesPaul Blomberg / Bill Rhoades vs Jack Henry / John Popplewell6-1, 7-5
2022-04-15Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesTom Lonergan / Paul Blomberg vs Greg Powell / Christopher Gilmore6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRuss DeMoss / Joseph Collins vs Larry Kaster / Alan Montrose6-0, 6-4
2022-04-01Split 1–1
L#2 DoublesMichael Lavios / Alan Kaplan vs Eric Cooley / Edwin Becker6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesBill Rhoades / Tom Lonergan vs Daniel Beebe / John la Plante6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Alan Kaplan
11W–13L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Tom Lonergan
104W–99L career
0%87%13%
3.47
4
Bill Rhoades
79W–87L career
43%57%0%
3.46
3.5
Russ DeMoss
84W–42L career · type A
0%97%3%
3.38
3.5
Michael Lavios
30W–56L career
2%89%8%
3.33

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.